Safeguarding satisfactory anaesthetic practice - a cross-sectional study of anaesthetic personnel’s experiences and perspectives in Norway
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/37945Dato
2025-07-17Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Leonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist; Haugen, Arvid Steinar; Ræder, Johan; Finjarn, Therese Jenssen; Isern, Erik Ramon; Aakre, Elin Kismul; Gran Bruun, Anne Marie; Hennum, Kristoffer; Nilsen, Tina; Ramstad, Jan Petter; Saltnes, Cathrine; Monsen, Svein ArneSammendrag
Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional, observational design, utilizing a questionnaire. A purposive sampling strategy was employed, inviting all members of the two associations (N = 3300) to participate in a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 28. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests were utilized to analyze the data. A two-sided p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: In total, 823 respondents (24.9%) completed the questionnaire in September 2024. The results indicate several areas for improvement to achieve the recommended standards of anesthetic practice as outlined by the NSA. Statistically significant differences were observed between responses from anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists. Approximately two-thirds of respondents reported the NSA as relevant to their daily work, and between 13 and 30 percent had experienced or were aware of situations where the standard was utilized in root cause analyses of adverse anesthetic events.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the NSA is employed in clinical practice. However, assuming the NSA ensures satisfactory anesthetic practice, there are several areas requiring improvement. Given the overlapping roles and responsibilities of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists, the NSA may serve as a model for similar guidelines in other countries.