Vessel co-option in primary human tumors and metastases: an obstacle to effective anti-angiogenic treatment?
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/6324Date
2013Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Author
Dønnem, Tom; Hu, Jiangting; Ferguson, M.; Adighibe, Omanma; Snell, Cameron; Harris, Adrian L.; Gatter, Kevin C; Pezzella, FAbstract
Angiogenesis has been regarded as essential for tumor growth and progression.
Studies of many human tumors, however, suggest that their microcirculation
may be provided by nonsprouting vessels and that a variety of tumors can grow
and metastasize without angiogenesis. Vessel co-option, where tumor cells
migrate along the preexisting vessels of the host organ, is regarded as an alternative
tumor blood supply. Vessel co-option may occur in many malignancies,
but so far mostly reported in highly vascularized tissues such as brain, lung,
and liver. In primary and metastatic lung cancer and liver metastasis from different
primary origins, as much as 10–30% of the tumors are reported to use
this alternative blood supply. In addition, vessel co-option is introduced as a
potential explanation of antiangiogenic drug resistance, although the impact of
vessel co-option in this clinical setting is still to be further explored. In this
review we discuss tumor vessel co-option with specific examples of vessel cooption
in primary and secondary tumors and a consideration of the clinical
implications of this alternative tumor blood supply.
Publisher
WileyCitation
Cancer Medicine 2(2013) nr. 4 s. 427-436Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
The following license file are associated with this item: