dc.contributor.author | Scheel, Benedicte | |
dc.contributor.author | Holtedahl, Knut A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-25T11:04:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-25T11:04:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective. To study the relative importance of different tools a GP can use during the diagnostic process towards cancer
detection. <p>Design. Retrospective cohort study with prospective registration of cancer in general practice. Setting and subjects.
One hundred and fi fty-seven Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) reported 261 cancer patients.<p> Method. During
10 consecutive days, GPs registered all patient consultations and recorded any presence of seven focal symptoms and three
general symptoms, commonly considered as warning signs of cancer (WSC). Follow-up was done six to 11 months later.
For each patient with new or recurrent cancer, the GP completed a questionnaire with medical-record-based information
concerning the diagnostic procedure. <p>Results. In 78% of cancer cases, symptoms, signs, or tests helped diagnose cancer. In
90 cases, there were 131 consultation-recorded WSC that seemed related to the cancer. Further symptoms were reported
for another 74 cases. Different clinical signs were noted in 41 patients, 16 of whom had no previous recording of symptoms.
Supplementary tests added information in 59 cases; in 25 of these there were no recordings of symptoms or signs. Sensitivity
of any cancer-relevant symptom or clinical fi nding ranged from 100% for patients with uterine body cancer to 57% for
patients with renal cancer. <p>Conclusion. WSC had a major role as initiator of a cancer diagnostic procedure. Low-risk-butnot-no-risk
symptoms also played an important role, and in 7% of patients they were the only symptoms. Clinical fi ndings
and/or supplementary procedures were sometimes decisive for rapid referral. | en_US |
dc.description | Published version, also available at <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1067512>http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2015.1067512</a>
License: Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by/4.0/) | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2015, 33:170-177 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1279358 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3109/02813432.2015.1067512 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1502-7724 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8560 | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-uit_munin_8133 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Open | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800::Community medicine, Social medicine: 801 | en_US |
dc.subject | Early detection of cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | early diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject | family practice | en_US |
dc.subject | general practice | en_US |
dc.subject | neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject | Norway | en_US |
dc.subject | pathological conditions | en_US |
dc.subject | signs and symptoms | en_US |
dc.title | Symptoms, signs, and tests: The general practitioner's comprehensive approach towards a cancer diagnosis | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |