ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/9051
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0022
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (1.165Mb)
publisher's pdf (PDF)
Date
2015-04-28
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Fabregas, Antonio; Marín, Rafael
Abstract
Aspectual notions, although displayed most clearly in verbs, manifest across categories, with notions like (un)boundedness manifesting themselves in several instantiations which are sometimes specific of individual grammatical categories. This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on how aspectual notions emerge in different categorial domains by an analysis of subject-experiencer and object-experiencer psychological predicates (SEPVs and OEPVs, respectively). We review the evidence that SEPVs denote individual level (IL) states, and provide new facts – taken from the behaviour of participles – in favour of that diagnostic; we also argue that OEPVs should be classified as states of the stage level (SL) class. We argue that OEPVs denote states with an onset, which corresponds to the denotation of SLs. SEPVs simply denote states without boundaries, which we argue to correspond to IL predicates. Finally, we show how these two denotations follow without further assumptions from the structures proposed for SEPVs and OEPVs in previous work, specially Pesetsky (1995), making it unnecessary to postulate that the distinction is of lexical nature.
Description
Proof. Published version available at http://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2014-0022.
Publisher
De Gruyter
Citation
The Linguistic Review 2015, 32(2):227-275
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur) [1473]

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)