dc.contributor.author | Jensen, Stig Rune | |
dc.contributor.author | Saha, Santanu | |
dc.contributor.author | Flores-Livas, Jose A | |
dc.contributor.author | Huhn, William | |
dc.contributor.author | Blum, Volker | |
dc.contributor.author | Goedecker, Stefan | |
dc.contributor.author | Frediani, Luca | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-02T12:59:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-02T12:59:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-03-14 | |
dc.description.abstract | Using multiwavelets, we have obtained total energies and corresponding atomization energies for the GGA-PBE and hybrid-PBE0 density functionals for a test set of 211 molecules with an unprecedented and guaranteed μHartree accuracy. These quasi-exact references allow us to quantify the accuracy of standard all-electron basis sets that are believed to be highly accurate for molecules, such as Gaussian-type orbitals (GTOs), all-electron numeric atom-centered orbitals (NAOs), and full-potential augmented plane wave (APW) methods. We show that NAOs are able to achieve the so-called chemical accuracy (1 kcal/mol) for the typical basis set sizes used in applications, for both total and atomization energies. For GTOs, a triple-ζ quality basis has mean errors of ∼10 kcal/mol in total energies, while chemical accuracy is almost reached for a quintuple-ζ basis. Due to systematic error cancellations, atomization energy errors are reduced by almost an order of magnitude, placing chemical accuracy within reach also for medium to large GTO bases, albeit with significant outliers. In order to check the accuracy of the computed densities, we have also investigated the dipole moments, where in general only the largest NAO and GTO bases are able to yield errors below 0.01 D. The observed errors are similar across the different functionals considered here. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Swiss National Science Foundation | en_US |
dc.description | This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see <a href=https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00255> https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00255</a>. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Jensen, S.R., Saha, S., Flores-Livas, J.A., Huhn, W., Blum, V., Goedecker, S. & Frediani, L. (2017). The Elephant in the Room of Density Functional Theory Calculations. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 8(7), 1449-1457. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00255 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1543019 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00255 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1948-7185 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/13340 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Chemical Society | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/SFF/179568/Norway/Centre for Theoretical and Computational Chemistry/CTCC/ | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Kjemi: 440 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Chemistry: 440 | en_US |
dc.title | The Elephant in the Room of Density Functional Theory Calculations | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |