dc.contributor.author | Shouli Pour, Fatemeh | |
dc.contributor.author | Jensen, Pernille Erland | |
dc.contributor.author | Pedersen, Kristine Bondo | |
dc.contributor.author | Lejon, Tore | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-20T09:00:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-20T09:00:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-04-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | Electrodialytic remediation is a method based on electrokinetics, in which an electric field of low
intensity increases the availability of pollutants in solid waste materials. The electric field induces
processes that mobilise and transport inorganic and organic pollutants. The transport of ions in
the electrodialytic cell is controlled by employing ion-exchange membranes, allowing separation
of the electrodes from the solids. In this study, using a two cell design, electrodialytic
experiments were conducted to compare remediation of a heavily oil-polluted soil from
Arkhangelsk, Russia. The 2-compartment cell has not previously been employed for
electrodialytic removal of organic pollutants and was tested along with the traditional 3-
compartment design. The influence of experimental variables (current density, remediation time,
stirring and light) and settings on the two cell designs was investigated. The highest removal
(77%) of total hydrocarbons (THC) was observed in the 3-compartment cell at high current
density (0.68 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>
), longer remediation time (28 days), stirring and exposure to daylight. High
current density and stirring increased the removal efficiencies in both cell designs. Within the
studied experimental domain, the removal efficiencies in the 3-compartment cell (10–77%) were,
however, higher than those observed in the 2-compartment cell (0–38%). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Shouli Pour, Jensen, Pedersen, Lejon. Comparison of 2- and 3-compartment electrodialytic remediation cells for oil polluted soil from northwest Russia. Environmental technology. 2020:1-8 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1815928 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09593330.2020.1749943 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0959-3330 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1479-487X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/27096 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Environmental technology | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2020 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of 2- and 3-compartment electrodialytic remediation cells for oil polluted soil from northwest Russia | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |