Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorSundsbø, Per-Arne
dc.contributor.authorDeshpande, Sujay
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T07:47:59Z
dc.date.available2024-05-22T07:47:59Z
dc.date.embargoEndDate2026-05-27
dc.date.issued2024-05-27
dc.description.abstract<p>Ice accretion is challenging for maritime and offshore operations in the Polar regions. Activities related to tourism, oil and gas exploration, fishing, and offshore wind energy are increasing in the arctic. Ice accretion on vessels and offshore structures pose a threat to structural integrity, vessel stability, and personnel safety in outdoor working environments. Freezing sea spray is the largest contributor to marine and offshore icing, attributing to 80-90% of offshore icing incidents. <p>Sea spray icing is a niche field with comparatively limited research. Theory related to this field is difficult to find from a single source and is spread throughout literature. Having no single source to refer to for theory and standards makes it challenging for new researchers in the field. <p>Models for prediction of sea spray icing are essential for safer maritime operations in the Arctic. Existing models have varying approaches and provide rather varying predictions, making it difficult to say which one is more accurate. Additionally, existing models are heavily dependent on existing empirical formulations developed from limited observations for important variables like spray flux, something pointed out to be the weakest link in any prediction model. Using these formulations, typically based on medium sized fishing vessels, limits the predictions to the type and size of vessel the formulations are based on. ISO35106 points this out with a comment that none of the current models can predict sea spray icing on a wide range of vessels. <p>Full-scale testing of sea spray icing poses significant challenges with respect to personnel safety in extreme weather conditions, as well as the costs associated with such testing. This has resulted in limited full-scale or laboratory data. This in turn makes it difficult for validating prediction models as well as for the development of new and better models. <p>Apart from different approaches, prediction models could have different purposes. Operational prediction models, or forecasting models, predict an icing rate for a given set of metocean conditions without any consideration of the type of vessel or structure. These could be best suited for taking precautionary actions in case heavy icing is forecasted. Comprehensive prediction models, on the other hand, can estimate the spatial distribution of icing over the vessel or structure surface for a set of metocean conditions. In other words, these can estimate the icing rates as a function of location on the surface. These are more suitable at the design stage to take anti-icing measures or design optimization of the vessel/structure itself to minimize icing or that of the heating systems. <p>The main objective of this PhD project was to develop a ‘general’ model for prediction of sea spray icing. After collecting extensive data from laboratory experiments, a forecasting type of model, Spice, was developed ‘bottom-up’ from the experimental data using Machine Learning. An upgrade to this model is later made using Computational Fluid Dynamics to estimate some variables essential for prediction. This model, dubbed Spice2, is a comprehensive prediction model and independent of any existing formulations for estimation of spray. Spice2 was validated with icing measurements from a full-scale test. <p>The study presents a shift from the traditional modelling methods owing to the techniques used. The presented models show promising results with considerable scope for improvements in future research. Main contributions: <ol> <li>Consolidation of theory, standards, and existing prediction models in a single source.</li> <li>Valuable sea spray icing data from the largest set of laboratory experiments to date.</li> <li>SPICE (Sea sPray ICE): A machine learning model for prediction of sea spray icing.</li> <li>SPICE2: An upgrade to SPICE using CFD to estimate ship specific parameters for prediction of icing rates and distribution of icing.</li> </ol>en_US
dc.description.doctoraltypeph.d.en_US
dc.description.popularabstractThe study proposes a hybrid Computational Fluid Dynamics - Machine Learning model for prediction of icing rates due to freezing sea spray, ‘SPICE’. When a wave impacts a ship or a structure, a spray of tiny sea water droplets is formed. In negative temperatures, these droplets freeze upon impact on the surface of a vessel or structure. Freezing sea spray accounts for 80-90% of all offshore icing incidents. In severe conditions, lopsided icing loads can lead to structural failure or capsizing. Prediction of sea spray icing helps in mitigating its dangers by allowing to take precautionary measures and for design optimization. SPICE is capable of predicting icing rates and the spatial distribution of ice on the surface of structures and moving vessels. and spatial distribution of icing on any arbitrary moving vesselen_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-7823-225-5
dc.identifier.issn978-82-7823-226-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/33590
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.relation.haspart<p>Paper 1: Deshpande, S., Sæterdal, A. & Sundsbø, P.-A. (2021). Sea Spray Icing: The Physical Process and Review of Prediction Models and Winterization Techniques. <i>Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 143</i>(6), 061061. (Accepted manuscript version). Published version not available in Munin due to publisher’s restrictions. Published version available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050892>https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4050892</a>. <p>Paper 2: Deshpande, S., Sæterdal, A. & Sundsbø, P.-A. (2024). Experiments with Sea Spray Icing: Investigation of Icing Rates. <i>Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 146</i>(1), 011601. (Accepted manuscript version). Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/33439>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/33439</a>. Published version not available in Munin due to publisher’s restrictions. Published version available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062255>https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062255</a>. <p>Paper 3: Deshpande, S. (2024). A Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Marine Icing. <i>Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 146</i>(6), 061601. (Accepted manuscript version). Published version not available in Munin due to publisher’s restrictions. Published version available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064108>https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064108</a>. <p>Paper 4: Deshpande, S. & Sundsbø, P.-A. Investigation into using CFD for estimation of ship specific parameters for the SPICE model for prediction of sea spray icing. Part 1: The proposal. (Manuscript). <p>Paper 5: Sundsbø, P.-A. & Deshpande, S. Investigation into using CFD for estimation of ship specific parameters for the SPICE model for prediction of sea spray icing. Part 2: Verification of Spice2 with full scale test. (Manuscript).en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoedAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)
dc.subject.courseIDDOKTOR-008
dc.subjectSea spray icing, offshore, maritime, cold climate technology, Machine Learning, Computational Fluid Dynamics,en_US
dc.titleSea Spray Icing Prediction: Integrating Experiments, Machine Learning, and Computational Fluid Dynamicsen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.typeDoktorgradsavhandlingen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel