Ethiopia: when the Gadaa democracy rules in a federal state. Bridging indigenous institutions of governance to modern democracy
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/5080Dato
2012-05-22Type
Master thesisMastergradsoppgave
Forfatter
Sirna, Zelalem TesfayeSammendrag
As student of law and later as a teacher, I was questioning whether Gadaa System has
something to contribute to democratic values and sustainable institutions of governance
in contemporary Ethiopian legal system. In particular, in sub-Saharan African countries
where democracy and rule of law are proclaimed but not translated into practice, it
appears vital to look into alternatives that can ll governance de cits. It is against this
backdrop and after series of research processes; eld work among the Boran and Guji-
Oromo, that Ethiopia: When the Gadaa Democracy Rules in a Federal State; Bridging
Indigenous Institutions of Governance to Modern Democracy came into focus.
The main objective of this research is, therefore, to respond to the search of alternative
solution to hurdles democratisation process, Africa as a region as well as Ethiopia as a
country faces, through African indigenous knowledge of governance, namely the Gadaa
System. Accordingly, institutional and fundamental principles analysed in this thesis
clearly indicate that indigenous system of governance such as the Gadaa System embraces
archaic democratic values that are useful even today. However, bridging two separate
institutions and political systems is not without challenges. This study is committed
to discerning tensions and compatibility issues. The incompatibilities arise from both
political systems; indigenous as well as modern. However, they bear not only tensions
but also solutions. Hence, where the challenges that arise from indigenous political
system could be resolved by progressive principles of modern political systems; tensions
that arise from modern political system are sought to be addressed by embracing legally
viable values of the Gadaa System through the instrumentality of federalism and legal
pluralism. In sum, three main reasons support the approach of this study: in Africa no
system of governance is perfect divorced from its indigenous institutions of governance;
indigenous knowledge of governance as a resource that could enhance democratisation
in Ethiopia should not be left at peripheries; and an inclusive policy that accommodates
diversity and ensures the advancement of human culture appeals.
Forlag
Universitetet i TromsøUniversity of Tromsø
Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Copyright 2012 The Author(s)
Følgende lisensfil er knyttet til denne innførselen: