ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for matematikk og statistikk
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (matematikk og statistikk)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for matematikk og statistikk
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (matematikk og statistikk)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Computer-aided decision support for melanoma detection applied on melanocytic and non-melanocytic skin lesions: a comparison of two systems based on automatic analysis of dermoscopic images

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/8870
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/579282
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (3.651Mb)
(PDF)
Date
2015
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Møllersen, Kajsa; Kirchesch, Herbert M.; Zortea, Maciel; Schopf, Thomas Roger Griesbeck; Hindberg, Kristian; Godtliebsen, Fred
Abstract
Commercially available clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) for skin cancer have been designed for the detection of melanoma only. Correct use of the systems requires expert knowledge, hampering their utility for nonexperts. Furthermore, there are no systems to detect other common skin cancer types, that is, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). As early diagnosis of skin cancer is essential, there is a need for a CDSS that is applicable to all types of skin lesions and is suitable for nonexperts. Nevus Doctor (ND) is a CDSS being developed by the authors. We here investigate ND’s ability to detect both melanoma and NMSC and the opportunities for improvement. An independent test set of dermoscopic images of 870 skin lesions, including 44 melanomas and 101 NMSCs, were analysed by ND. Its sensitivity to melanoma and NMSC was compared to that of Mole Expert (ME), a commercially available CDSS, using the same set of lesions. ND and ME had similar sensitivity to melanoma. For ND at 95% melanoma sensitivity, the NMSC sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 12%. The melanomas misclassified by ND at 95% sensitivity were correctly classified by ME, and vice versa. ND is able to detect NMSC without sacrificing melanoma sensitivity.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Citation
BioMed Research International 2015, Article ID 579282
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (matematikk og statistikk) [353]

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)