Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeonardsen, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Arvid Steinar
dc.contributor.authorRæder, Johan
dc.contributor.authorFinjarn, Therese Jenssen
dc.contributor.authorIsern, Erik Ramon
dc.contributor.authorAakre, Elin Kismul
dc.contributor.authorGran Bruun, Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorHennum, Kristoffer
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Tina
dc.contributor.authorRamstad, Jan Petter
dc.contributor.authorSaltnes, Cathrine
dc.contributor.authorMonsen, Svein Arne
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-11T13:02:43Z
dc.date.available2025-08-11T13:02:43Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-17
dc.description.abstractBackground: Globally, anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists collaborate closely during anesthesia administration. However, there is a scarcity of guidelines detailing the division of tasks and responsibilities between these two professions. The Norwegian Standard for the Safe Practice of Anesthesia (NSA) was developed jointly by the Norwegian Association of Anesthesiologists and the Norwegian Association of Nurse Anesthetists as a consensus guideline to safeguard satisfactory anesthetic practice. This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists regarding the NSA.<p> <p>Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional, observational design, utilizing a questionnaire. A purposive sampling strategy was employed, inviting all members of the two associations (N = 3300) to participate in a web-based survey. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 28. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests were utilized to analyze the data. A two-sided p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.<p> <p>Results: In total, 823 respondents (24.9%) completed the questionnaire in September 2024. The results indicate several areas for improvement to achieve the recommended standards of anesthetic practice as outlined by the NSA. Statistically significant differences were observed between responses from anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists. Approximately two-thirds of respondents reported the NSA as relevant to their daily work, and between 13 and 30 percent had experienced or were aware of situations where the standard was utilized in root cause analyses of adverse anesthetic events.<p> <p>Conclusion: The findings suggest that the NSA is employed in clinical practice. However, assuming the NSA ensures satisfactory anesthetic practice, there are several areas requiring improvement. Given the overlapping roles and responsibilities of anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists, the NSA may serve as a model for similar guidelines in other countries.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLeonardsen A, Haugen AS, Ræder J, Finjarn TJ, Isern Er, Aakre EK, Gran Bruun AM, Hennum K, Nilsen T, Ramstad JP, Saltnes C, Monsen SA. Safeguarding satisfactory anaesthetic practice - a cross-sectional study of anaesthetic personnel’s experiences and perspectives in Norway. Anesthesiology Research and Practice. 2025
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2391441
dc.identifier.doihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/anrp/6302974/
dc.identifier.issn1687-6962
dc.identifier.issn1687-6970
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/37945
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.journalAnesthesiology Research and Practice
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2025 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleSafeguarding satisfactory anaesthetic practice - a cross-sectional study of anaesthetic personnel’s experiences and perspectives in Norwayen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)