dc.contributor.author | Semenchuk, Philipp | |
dc.contributor.author | Gillespie, Mark | |
dc.contributor.author | Rumpf, Sabine Bettina | |
dc.contributor.author | Baggesen, Nanna Schrøder | |
dc.contributor.author | Cooper, Elisabeth J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-03T15:45:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-03T15:45:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11-29 | |
dc.description.abstract | The duration of specific periods within a plant’s life cycle are critical for plant growth and
performance. In the High Arctic, the start of many of these phenological periods is determined by
snowmelt date, which may change in a changing climate. It has been suggested that the end of these
periods during late-season are triggered by external cues, such as day length, light quality or
temperature, leading to the hypothesis that earlier or later snowmelt dates will lengthen or shorten the
duration of these periods, respectively, and thereby affect plant performance.Wetested whether
snowmelt date controls phenology and phenological period duration in High Arctic Svalbard using a
melt timing gradient from natural and experimentally altered snow depths.Weinvestigated the
response of early- and late-season phenophases from both vegetative and reproductive phenological
periods of eight common species.Wefound that all phenophases follow snowmelt patterns,
irrespective of timing of occurrence, vegetative or reproductive nature. Three of four phenological
period durations based on these phenophases were fixed for most species, defining the studied species
as periodic. Periodicity can thus be considered an evolutionary trait leading to disadvantages
compared with aperiodic species and we conclude that the mesic and heath vegetation types in
Svalbard are at risk of being outcompeted by invading, aperiodic species from milder biomes. | en_US |
dc.description | Published version. Source at <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125006> http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125006 </a> | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Semenchuk P, Gillespie M, Rumpf SB, Baggesen NS, Elberling B, Cooper E.J.. High Arctic plant phenology is determined by snowmelt patterns but duration of phenological periods is fixed: an example of periodicity. Environmental Research Letters. 2016;11(12) | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1435117 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125006 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1748-9326 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/10430 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | IOP Publishing | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Environmental Research Letters | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Spitsbergen | en_US |
dc.subject | Svalbard | en_US |
dc.subject | phenology | en_US |
dc.subject | phenophase | en_US |
dc.subject | phenoperiod | en_US |
dc.subject | growing-season length | en_US |
dc.subject | flowering | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480 | en_US |
dc.title | High Arctic plant phenology is determined by snowmelt patterns but duration of phenological periods is fixed: an example of periodicity | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |