Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKristjansdottir, Torhildur Fjola
dc.contributor.authorHoulihan Wiberg, Aoife Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorAndresen, Inger
dc.contributor.authorGeorges, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorHeeren, Niko
dc.contributor.authorGood, Clara
dc.contributor.authorBrattebø, Helge
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-08T10:29:41Z
dc.date.available2018-06-08T10:29:41Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-01
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the objective is to redesign a previous concept for a single-family Zero greenhouse gas Emission Building (ZEB). The concept is redesigned based on comparing greenhouse gas (GHG) emission loads and compensation from different design solutions applied in Norwegian single-family ZEB pilot buildings and selected sensitivity studies. The objective is to see if a previously developed ZEB model (2011) can be redesigned to achieve a life cycle energy and material emission balance (ZEB-OM), which previously was not achieved. Five different design parameters are evaluated: area efficiency, embodied emissions in the envelope, insulation thickness, heating systems and different roof forms with respect to the photovoltaic area. Embodied emissions reductions were possible in the ground foundation, from around 1 kg CO2/m2 to 0.6 kg CO2/m2 per year. Both models are able to compensate for all operational emissions. The new model is in addition able to compensate for 60% of embodied emissions, whereas the previous model only could compensate for 5%. The new model does not reach the life cycle energy and material balance. The paper presents and discusses different approaches for achieving the ZEB-OM balance. Further concept model optimization is needed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Research Council of Norway and several partners through the Research Center on Zero Emission Buildings (ZEB)en_US
dc.descriptionLink to publisher's version:<a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.046>Energy and Buildings (2018) 168, pp 457-469</a><p>© <2018>. This manuscript version is made available under the <a href=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/>CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license</a>en_US
dc.identifier.citationKristjansdottir TF, Houlihan Wiberg AAM, Andresen I, Georges L, Heeren N, Good CS, Brattebø H. Is a net life cycle balance for energy and materials achievable for a zero emission single-family building in Norway?. Energy and Buildings. (2018); vol 168, p 457-469en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1570212
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.046
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788
dc.identifier.issn1872-6178
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/12849
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalEnergy and Buildings
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 257660en_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.046
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Teknologi: 500::Miljøteknologi: 610en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Technology: 500::Building technology: 530en_US
dc.subjectLife cycleen_US
dc.titleIs a net life cycle balance for energy and materials achievable for a zero emission single-family building in Norway?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel