Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorMarcotty, Tanguy
dc.contributor.authorRouille, Elodie
dc.contributor.authorChilundo, Abel
dc.contributor.authorLetteson, Jean-Jacques
dc.contributor.authorGodfroid, Jacques
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-27T12:42:26Z
dc.date.available2019-03-27T12:42:26Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-29
dc.description.abstractBrucellosis is of worldwide economic and public health importance. Heifer vaccination with live attenuated <i>Brucella abortus</i> strain 19 (S19) is the cornerstone of control in low- and middle-income countries. Antibody persistence induced by S19 is directly correlated with the number of colony-forming units (CFU) per dose. There are two vaccination methods: a ‘high’ dose (5–8 × 10<sup>10</sup> CFU) subcutaneously injected or one or two ‘low’ doses (5 × 10<sup>9</sup> CFU) through the conjunctival route. This study aimed to evaluate serological reactions to the ‘high’ dose and possible implications of the serological findings on disease control. This study included 58 female cases, vaccinated at Day 0, and 29 male controls. Serum was drawn repeatedly and tested for <i>Brucella</i> antibodies using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA). The cases showed a rapid antibody response with peak RBT positivity (98%) at 2 weeks and iELISA (95%) at 8 weeks, then decreased in an inverse logistic curve to 14% RBT and 32% iELISA positive at 59 weeks and at 4.5 years 57% (4/7 cases) demonstrated a persistent immune response (RBT, iELISA or Brucellin skin test) to <i>Brucella</i> spp. Our study is the first of its kind documenting the persistence of antibodies in an African communal farming setting for over a year to years after ‘high’ dose S19 vaccination, which can be difficult to differentiate from a response to infection with wild-type <i>B. abortus</i>. A recommendation could be using a ‘low’ dose or different route of vaccination.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Belgium Institute of Tropical Medicine The University of Pretoriaen_US
dc.descriptionSource at <a href=https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1527> https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1527</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSimpson, G., Marcotty, T., Rouille, E., Chilundo, A., Letteson, J.-J. & Godfroid, J. (2018). Immunological response to <i>Brucella abortus</i> strain 19 vaccination of cattle in a communal area in South Africa. <i>Journal of the South African Veterinary Association, 89</i>. https://doi.org/10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1527en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1684096
dc.identifier.doi10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1527
dc.identifier.issn0038-2809
dc.identifier.issn2224-9435
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/15082
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the South African Veterinary Association
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Basic medical, dental and veterinary science disciplines: 710::Medical immunology: 716en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710::Medisinsk immunologi: 716en_US
dc.titleImmunological response to Brucella abortus strain 19 vaccination of cattle in a communal area in South Africaen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel