Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorWangensteen, Owen
dc.contributor.advisorPræbel, Kim
dc.contributor.authorGuri, Gledis
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T12:56:28Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T12:56:28Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01
dc.description.abstractWorld’s population growth and rise in food consumption per capita have led to increased food demand and overexploitation of natural resources in recent decades. Such increase has threatened the global feeding schemes to maintain a balance between food supply and demand. Although “The Blue Revolution” promised to fill such gap and simultaneously alleviate the overexploitation of the oceans, deterioration of biota in the surrounding marine environment from aquaculture pollution has been reported. To investigate the effects of this pollution in the biodiversity of benthic communities, I applied a metabarcoding surveillance method before and after the establishment of a salmon aquaculture facility at Dyrøya Island, Norway. Twelve monitoring stations were established and divided into three transects, each containing four stations at increasing distance from the cages. To distinguish the patterns of impact, I estimated alpha and beta diversity for each station using two metabarcoding markers (COI and 18S). Analysis showed a significant increase of alpha biodiversity after the establishment of the aquaculture where such increase occurred only in the North transect (aligned with the main current) at all distances from the cages. Alpha diversity analysis suggested that the spread of impact was heterogeneous throughout the transects and homogeneous throughout the sampled distances. Significant differences in community composition and beta diversity (only for COI marker) after the establishment of the aquaculture were observed. The spread of such change occurred homogeneously among all the monitoring stations, transects and distances from the cages. These findings support the hypothesis that the establishment of the aquaculture activities, alone, did not lead to these changes in beta diversity, which could rather be a result of seasonal variability. This study stresses the need for high sequencing depth, broad study area, and a combination of traditional surveys with metabarcoding approaches when conducting molecular biodiversity assessments.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/19104
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en_US
dc.subject.courseIDBIO-3950
dc.subjectmetabarcodingen_US
dc.subjectbenthic communitiesen_US
dc.subjectaquaculture impactsen_US
dc.subjectbiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480::Marine biology: 497en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480::Marinbiologi: 497en_US
dc.titleCan aquaculture impact the surrounding biodiversity? A metabarcoding assessmenten_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.typeMastergradsoppgaveen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)