Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEhrich, Dorothee
dc.contributor.authorArrigo, Nils
dc.contributor.authorTuszynski, Jarek W.
dc.contributor.authorGerdes, Tommy
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Nadir
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-12T09:01:51Z
dc.date.available2009-10-12T09:01:51Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-26
dc.description.abstractBackground: Since the transfer and application of modern sequencing technologies to the analysis of amplified fragment-length polymorphisms (AFLP), evolutionary biologists have included an increasing number of samples and markers in their studies. Although justified in this context, the use of automated scoring procedures may result in technical biases that weaken the power and reliability of further analyses. <br> Results: Using a new scoring algorithm, RawGeno, we show that scoring errors – in particular 'bin oversplitting' (i.e. when variant sizes of the same AFLP marker are not considered as homologous) and 'technical homoplasy' (i.e. when two AFLP markers that differ slightly in size are mistakenly considered as being homologous) – induce a loss of discriminatory power, decrease the robustness of results and, in extreme cases, introduce erroneous information in genetic structure analyses. In the present study, we evaluate several descriptive statistics that can be used to optimize the scoring of the AFLP analysis, and we describe a new statistic, the information content per bin (I<sub>bin</sub>) that represents a valuable estimator during the optimization process. This statistic can be computed at any stage of the AFLP analysis without requiring the inclusion of replicated samples. Finally, we show that downstream analyses are not equally sensitive to scoring errors. Indeed, although a reasonable amount of flexibility is allowed during the optimization of the scoring procedure without causing considerable changes in the detection of genetic structure patterns, notable discrepancies are observed when estimating genetic diversities from differently scored datasets. <br> Conclusion: Our algorithm appears to perform as well as a commercial program in automating AFLP scoring, at least in the context of population genetics or phylogeographic studies. To our knowledge, RawGeno is the only freely available public-domain software for fully automated AFLP scoring, from electropherogram files to user-defined working binary matrices. RawGeno was implemented in an R CRAN package (with an user-friendly GUI) and can be found at http://sourceforge.net/projects/rawgenoen
dc.format.extent3659662 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationBMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:33en
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 486526en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/2160
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_1912
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.subjectVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Basic biosciences: 470::Bioinformatics: 475en
dc.titleEvaluating the impact of scoring parameters on the structure of intra-specific genetic variation using RawGeno, an R package for automating AFLP scoringen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen
dc.typePeer revieweden


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel