Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGeoffroy, Maxime
dc.contributor.authorLangbehn, Tom
dc.contributor.authorPriou, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorVarpe, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Geir
dc.contributor.authorLe Bris, Arnault
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Jonathan A. D.
dc.contributor.authorDaase, Malin
dc.contributor.authorMckee, David
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Jonathan H.
dc.contributor.authorBerge, Jørgen
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-17T11:07:02Z
dc.date.available2021-08-17T11:07:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-22
dc.description.abstractIn situ observations of pelagic fish and zooplankton with optical instruments usually rely on external light sources. However, artificial light may attract or repulse marine organisms, which results in biased measurements. It is often assumed that most pelagic organisms do not perceive the red part of the visible spectrum and that red light can be used for underwater optical measurements of biological processes. Using hull-mounted echosounders above an acoustic probe or a baited video camera, each equipped with light sources of different colours (white, blue and red), we demonstrate that pelagic organisms in Arctic and temperate regions strongly avoid artificial light, including visible red light (575–700 nm), from instruments lowered in the water column. The density of organisms decreased by up to 99% when exposed to artificial light and the distance of avoidance varied from 23 to 94 m from the light source, depending on colours, irradiance levels and, possibly, species communities. We conclude that observations from optical and acoustic instruments, including baited cameras, using light sources with broad spectral composition in the 400–700 nm wavelengths do not capture the real state of the ecosystem and that they cannot be used alone for reliable abundance estimates or behavioural studies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGeoffroy, Langbehn, Priou, Varpe, Johnsen, Le Bris, Fisher, Daase, Mckee D, Cohen, Berge. Pelagic organisms avoid white, blue, and red artificial light from scientific instruments. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1925285
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-021-94355-6
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/22095
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNature Researchen_US
dc.relation.journalScientific Reports
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/KLIMAFORSK/300333/Norway/The impact of artificial light on arctic marine organisms and ecosystems during the polar night//en_US
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/NANSEN/ 276730/Norway/The Nansen Legacy//en_US
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/SFF/223254/Norway/Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems/AMOS/en_US
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCN/MARINFORSK/294819/Norway/The fundamental role of mesopelagic fishes for the structure and change of Northeast Atlantic marine ecosystems//en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Zoology and botany: 480en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Zoologiske og botaniske fag: 480en_US
dc.titlePelagic organisms avoid white, blue, and red artificial light from scientific instrumentsen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel