Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAarflot, Johanna Myrseth
dc.contributor.authorBjørdal, Vilde Regine
dc.contributor.authorDunlop, Katherine Mary
dc.contributor.authorEspinasse, Marina
dc.contributor.authorHusson, Berengere
dc.contributor.authorLindstrøm, Ulf Ove
dc.contributor.authorKeulder-Stenevik, Felicia Juanita
dc.contributor.authorOno, Kotaro
dc.contributor.authorSiwertsson, Anna
dc.contributor.authorSkern-Mauritzen, Mette
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-04T09:09:53Z
dc.date.available2024-10-04T09:09:53Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-30
dc.description.abstractCoastal and adjacent shelf waters are generally highly productive ecosystems harboring important ecological processes and exposed to a range of anthropogenic pressures from land-based and marine sectors. Ensuring that the cumulative pressures from human activities do not cause unacceptable, permanent harm to the ecosystem is challenging but crucial for sustainable management of these regions. Linkage frameworks and ecological risk assessments have proven to be useful tools for holistic evaluations of cumulative human pressures as a guide to managers and policy makers for prioritization of risk factors. Here, we present the first holistic assessment of ecosystem risk from human activities along the Norwegian coast. Pressures from coastal sectors are identified and weighted by the exposure to and potential impact on ecosystem components following the ODEMM (Options for Delivering Ecosystem-based Marine Management) framework. We focus on four coastal regions with contrasting scales of human activities. Two southern regions with multiple anthropogenic activities are associated with higher cumulative risk of negative impacts compared to northern areas where less extensive activities have a lower potential of harming the coastal ecosystems. Despite latitudinal differences in human use of the coastline, the pressures and ecosystem components associated with the greatest risk of cumulative impacts are relatively similar between the regions. Contaminants and underwater noise stand out as high-risk pressures, associated with multiple sectors with a high spatiotemporal footprint and with the potential to negatively impact a range of ecosystem components. Nevertheless, a confidence assessment also highlights the need for more in-depth analysis on the input, spread and effect of these pressures on coastal ecosystems. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of the risk assessment framework and suggest new directions which may enhance the utility and uptake of such assessments for sustainable management of coastal ecosystems.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAarflot, Bjørdal, Dunlop, Espinasse, Husson, Lindstrøm, Keulder-Stenevik, Ono, Siwertsson, Skern-Mauritzen. Ecosystem risk from human use of ocean space and resources: a case study from the Norwegian coast. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2024en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2283640
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107299
dc.identifier.issn0964-5691
dc.identifier.issn1873-524X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35046
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.journalOcean and Coastal Management
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleEcosystem risk from human use of ocean space and resources: a case study from the Norwegian coasten_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)