Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorWoldeselassie, Zerihun 
dc.contributor.authorRao, Divya Ramakrishna
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-02T03:00:33Z
dc.date.available2025-07-02T03:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPeace and Conflict Studies, as an interdisciplinary field, has long prided itself on normative commitments to justice, nonviolence, and transformation. However, as the field matures, it is imperative to scrutinise the analytical robustness, political implications, and epistemic assumptions of its core paradigms. This kind of reflexivity is especially necessary in the context of hyperconnected globalised extremism, where the boundaries between ‘local and global’, ‘oppressor and resister’, or even ‘coloniser and de-coloniser’ are increasingly blurred. Through a critical discourse analysis of the instrumentalization of Hindutva (Hindu nationalism) in the Anders Breivik manifesto (2011), this research aims to serve a compelling case of transnational extremism and ideological diffusion that can test the aptness and/or limits of Galtung’s conflict triangle, decolonial peace, and transitional justice. Key findings suggest that: a) Extremism is now networked beyond national jurisdictions into multidimensional crises, demonstrating the limits of bounded national analysis in the Galtung model, thus making digitally literate transnational analysis essential; b) Groups claiming postcolonial legitimacy can display cynical opportunism (Hindutva’s proponents as defenders against ‘Western imperialism’) or decolonial dissonance (Nordic exceptionalism in perceptions of Norway’s ‘imperial innocence’) and may still perpetuate supremacist violence, thus illustrating the limits of decolonial ethics; and c) In a fast evolving digital era, transitional justice’s state-centric model can struggle to hold accountable the globalised form of complicity in extremism (social media giants or vis-à-vis Hindutva, where the state itself is complicit in violence), thus necessitating hybrid updates combining state-centric responses counter-balanced with grassroots, ‘transformative justice’ mechanisms. [Keywords] Hindutva · Breivik · Transnational Extremism · Galtung · Decolonial · Transitional Justice
dc.description.abstract
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/37370
dc.identifierno.uit:wiseflow:7269056:62393136
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norway
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2025 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleHindutva in the Breivik Manifesto: A Case Study Inspecting Paradigm Reflexivity in Peace and Conflict Studies
dc.typeMaster thesis


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)