ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for teknologi og sikkerhet
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (teknologi og sikkerhet)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for teknologi og sikkerhet
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (teknologi og sikkerhet)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Human reliability assessment (HRA) in maintenance of production process: A case study

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/10382
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0453-z
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (367.9Kb)
(PDF)
Dato
2016-04-02
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Aalipour, Mojgan; Ayele, Yonas Zewdu; Barabadi, Abbas
Sammendrag
Human reliability makes a considerable contribution to the maintenance performance, safety, and cost-efficiency of any production process. To improve human reliability, the causes of human errors should be identified and the probability of human errors should be quantified. Analysis of human error is very case-specific; the context of the field should be taken into account. The aim of this study is to identify the causes of human errors and improve human reliability in maintenance activities in the cable manufacturing industry. The central thrust of this paper is to employ the three most common HRA techniques—human error assessment and reduction technique, standardized plant analysis risk-human reliability, and Bayesian network—for estimating human error probabilities and then to check the consistency of the results obtained. The case study results demonstrated that the main causes of human error during maintenance activities are time pressure, lack of experience, and poor procedure. Moreover, the probabilities of human error, obtained by employing the three techniques, are similar and consistent.
Beskrivelse
Manuscript. Published version available in International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management. 2016;7(2):229-238
Forlag
Springer
Sitering
Aalipour, M., Ayele, Y.Z. & Barabadi, A. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag (2016) 7: 229. doi:10.1007/s13198-016-0453-z
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (teknologi og sikkerhet) [361]

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring