ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for biovitenskap, fiskeri og økonomi
  • Institutt for arktisk og marin biologi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (arktisk og marin biologi)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for biovitenskap, fiskeri og økonomi
  • Institutt for arktisk og marin biologi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (arktisk og marin biologi)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Ungulate population monitoring in an open tundra landscape: distance sampling versus total counts

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/11943
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00299
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (1.155Mb)
(PDF)
Date
2017-07-27
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Le Moullec, Mathilde; Pedersen, Åshild Ønvik; Yoccoz, Nigel Gilles; Aanes, Ronny; Tufto, Jarle; Hansen, Brage Bremset
Abstract
Researchers and wildlife managers strive for low bias and high precision (i.e. high accuracy) when estimating animal population sizes. Distance sampling is currently one of the most widely used monitoring methods. However, it relies on strict sampling designs and modeling assumptions that can be difficult to meet in the field. Here, we use data from two sub-populations of non-migratory wild Svalbard reindeer Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus inhabiting flat, open and isolated coastal tundra plains, to demonstrate some challenges related to the distance sampling methodology. To achieve this, we compared distance sampling line transect estimates with repeated total population counts and combined available software tools (R packages unmarked , Distance and dsm ) to fulfill the analytical requirements of small study sites in which large areas are surveyed relative to the study area size. Based on low variation among repeated total counts (CV = 0.02 – 0.06) and the virtual absence of false negatives and positives of marked animals, the total counts could be used as reference popula- tion sizes. Distance sampling estimates were not statistically different from the total count estimates. Our relatively large sample size of 143 observations enabled precise distance sampling abundance estimates (CV = 0.16 – 0.26) compared with other studies in the wild. However, capturing the processes shaping population dynamics would likely require even higher sampling effort or other, more resource demanding monitoring tools, such as total counts or mark-recapture. In this type of ecosystem, distance sampling nevertheless represents a cost-effective tool suitable for ‘population state’ assessment and studies of large-scale spatial distribution patterns. Our study stresses the importance of choosing the appropriate analytical tools and estimating the accuracy of the monitoring methods that are used to achieve specific scientific, management or conservation goals
Description
Source at https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00299
Publisher
Nordic Council for Wildlife Research
Citation
Le Moullec M, Pedersen ÅØ, Yoccoz NG, Aanes R, Tufto J, Hansen BB. Ungulate population monitoring in an open tundra landscape: distance sampling versus total counts. Wildlife Biology. 2017;2017
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (arktisk og marin biologi) [1630]

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)