| dc.contributor.author | Starke, Michal | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-13T14:09:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-02-13T14:09:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-12-14 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The traditional notion of case is too coarse to distinguish between the English prepositional dative and the English shifted dative, the Spanish bare accusative and the Spanish “a” accusative, etc. I show that refining our typology of case to include such distinctions resolves a *ABA counterexample to Caha’s 2009 case hierarchy and I discuss where these new distinctions should be placed in the underlying representation of case. | en_US |
| dc.description | Source at <a href=https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.408> https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.408 </a>. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Starke, M. (2017) Resolving (DAT = ACC) ≠ GEN. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1490527 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2397-1835 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/12143 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Ubiquity Press | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Glossa: a journal of general linguistics | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | differential object marking | en_US |
| dc.subject | dative shift | en_US |
| dc.subject | Icelandic | en_US |
| dc.subject | case | en_US |
| dc.subject | *ABA | en_US |
| dc.subject | nanosyntax | en_US |
| dc.subject | VDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010 | en_US |
| dc.subject | VDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010 | en_US |
| dc.title | Resolving (DAT = ACC) ≠ GEN | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
| dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
| dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
English
norsk