Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStarke, Michal
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-13T14:09:33Z
dc.date.available2018-02-13T14:09:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-14
dc.description.abstractThe traditional notion of case is too coarse to distinguish between the English prepositional dative and the English shifted dative, the Spanish bare accusative and the Spanish “a” accusative, etc. I show that refining our typology of case to include such distinctions resolves a *ABA counterexample to Caha’s 2009 case hierarchy and I discuss where these new distinctions should be placed in the underlying representation of case.en_US
dc.descriptionSource at <a href=https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.408> https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.408 </a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationStarke, M. (2017) Resolving (DAT = ACC) ≠ GEN. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2397-1835
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1490527
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10037/12143
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUbiquity Pressen_US
dc.relation.journalGlossa: a journal of general linguistics
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectdifferential object markingen_US
dc.subjectdative shiften_US
dc.subjectIcelandicen_US
dc.subjectcaseen_US
dc.subject*ABAen_US
dc.subjectnanosyntaxen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Humanities: 000::Linguistics: 010en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Språkvitenskapelige fag: 010en_US
dc.titleResolving (DAT = ACC) ≠ GENen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel