dc.contributor.author | Vitale, Jacopo Antonino | |
dc.contributor.author | Weydahl, Andi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-09T11:17:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-09T11:17:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-05-11 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background:<br> Many variables related to sport have been
shown to have circadian rhythms. Chronotype is the expression
of circadian rhythmicity in an individual, and three categories
of chronotype are defined: morning types (M-types),
evening types (E-types), and neither types (N-types). M-types
show earlier peaks of several psychophysiological variables
during the day than E-types. The effect of chronotype on
athletic performance has not been extensively investigated.
<br>Objective:<br> The objective of the present review was to study
the effect of chronotype on athletic performance and the
psychophysiological responses to physical activity.
<br>Methods:<br> The present review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses)
reporting guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus,
and Web of Science for scientific papers using the keywords
‘‘chronotype’’, ‘‘circadian typology’’, ‘‘morningness’’,
and ‘‘eveningness’’ in combination with each of the words
‘‘sport’’, ‘‘performance’’, and ‘‘athletic.’’ Relevant reference
lists were inspected. We limited the search results to peerreviewed
papers published in English from 1985 to 2015.
<br>Results:<br> Ten papers met our inclusion criteria. Rating of
perceived exertion and fatigue scores in relation to athletic
performances are influenced by chronotype: M-types perceived
less effort when performing a submaximal physical
task in the morning than did N- and E-types. In addition,
M-types generally showed better athletic performances, as
measured by race times, in the morning than did N- and
E-types. Other results concerning chronotype effect on
physiological responses to physical activity were not always
consistent: heterogeneous samples and different kinds of
physical activity could partially explain these discrepancies.
<br>Conclusions:<br> Sports trainers and coaches should take into
account the influence of both the time of day and chronotype
effect when scheduling training sessions into specific
time periods. | en_US |
dc.description | This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Sports Medicine. The final authenticated version is available online at: <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z> http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z</a> | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Vitale, J. A. & Weydahl, A. (2017). Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine, 47(9), 1859–1868. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1472276 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0112-1642 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1179-2035 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/13188 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Sports Medicine | |
dc.relation.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0741-z | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Idrettsmedisinske fag: 850 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Sports medicine: 850 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Samfunnsvitenskapelige idrettsfag: 330 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Social science: 200::Social science in sports: 330 | en_US |
dc.title | Chronotype, Physical Activity, and Sport Performance: A Systematic Review | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |