Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTanyi, Attila
dc.contributor.authorMorganti, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-06T08:48:21Z
dc.date.available2018-08-06T08:48:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe present paper identifies a challenge for a certain view of practical reasons, according to which practical reasons (both normative and motivating) are states of affairs. The problem is that those who endorse such a view seem forced to maintain both a) that the contents of beliefs are states of affairs and b) that the conception according to which the contents of beliefs are states of affairs is outlandish. The suggestion is put forward that, by distinguishing the content of a belief (as a proposition) from its object (as a state of affairs), the conflict between a) and b) can be neutralised. The resulting proposal is of interest for all those sharing the view that practical reasons must be states of affairs, i.e., things capable of being the case.en_US
dc.descriptionAccepted manuscript version. Published version available at <a href=https://www.pdcnet.org/jpr/Journal-of-Philosophical-Research> https://www.pdcnet.org/jpr/Journal-of-Philosophical-Research</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTanyi, A. & Morganti, M. (2018). Reasons and Beliefs. Journal of Philosophical Research (JPR), 43. https://www.pdcnet.org/jpr/Journal-of-Philosophical-Researchen_US
dc.identifier.issn1053-8364
dc.identifier.issn2153-7984
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1598856
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10037/13357
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPhilosophy Documentation Centeren_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Philosophical Research (JPR)
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Filosofiske fag: 160en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Humanities: 000::Philosophical disciplines: 160en_US
dc.subjectPractical reasonsen_US
dc.subjectJonathan Dancyen_US
dc.subjectcontent of beliefen_US
dc.subjectobject of beliefen_US
dc.subjectstates of affairsen_US
dc.titleReasons and Beliefsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel