Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/15778
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020026
Thumbnail
Åpne
Published version (PDF)
Dato
2019-04-09
Type
Journal article
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Frantsvåg, Jan Erik; Strømme, Tormod Eismann
Sammendrag
Much of the debate on Plan S seems to concentrate on how to make toll-access journals open access, taking for granted that existing open access journals are Plan S-compliant. We suspected this was not so and set out to explore this using Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) metadata. We conclude that a large majority of open access journals are not Plan S-compliant, and that it is small publishers in the humanities and social sciences (HSS) not charging article processing charges (APC) that will face the largest challenge with becoming compliant. Plan S needs to give special considerations to smaller publishers and/or non-APC based journals.
Beskrivelse
Published Version, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020026
Tilknyttede forskningsdata
The data of this article will be made openly available at DataverseNO,https://doi.org/10.18710/YBGGTV.
Detailed descriptions of the data will be available, as part of the data deposit
Forlag
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Sitering
Frantsvåg, J.E., Strømme, T.E. (2019) Few Open Access Journals Are Compliant with Plan S. Publications, 2019, 7, (2), 18s. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020026
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger