Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorKnutsen, Synnøve Fønnebø
dc.contributor.authorPiira, Anu Mirjam
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T11:56:13Z
dc.date.available2020-04-28T11:56:13Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-19
dc.description.abstractBody-weight supported locomotor training (BWSLT) has been used to improve walking function in subjects with incomplete Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), but randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among subjects with long-standing (>2 years) incomplete SCI and poor walking function are scarce. This research aims to describe the methodology and report the results from two parallel, but independent, single-blinded RCTs. Inclusion criteria were: incomplete SCI American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grade C and D (AIS C and D), >2 years post injury, wheelchair dependent and BMI ≤30. Intervention groups received 60 days of BWSLT, manually assisted (study 1) or robot-assisted (study 2) with control groups receiving low-intensity usual care. Compared to controls, the intervention groups experienced a significant increase in lower extremity muscle strength (LEMS), but no improvement in walking function, quality of life (QoL) or psychological outcomes. Due to challenging recruitment, our study ended up recruiting persons who, at enrolment, were autonomously motivated subjects with high degree of physical activity and high expectations. This could possibly explain our null findings in most outcomes, possibly due to a “ceiling effect” where the participants already had attained close to their maximum potential. Our study was underpowered as we were only able to recruit 44 (73%) of the planned 60 study subjects. Therefore, for training that starts several years post-injury, we can neither refute nor support the efficacy of BWSLT for subjects with long-standing incomplete SCI with poor or non-existing baseline walking function. However, our results do not exclude the possibility that such training can be useful in other subjects with SCI, i.e. those with SCI in subacute or early chronic phase, or among SCI subjects with some walking function at baseline. Such studies would be useful and, if initiated, we recommend that block randomization based on baseline function be utilized.en_US
dc.description.doctoraltypeph.d.en_US
dc.description.popularabstractTwo randomized controlled clinical trials assessed the effect of manual or robot-assisted treadmill training in persons with long-standing (>12 years) incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). We were only able to recruit 73% of the planned number of participants. The intervention groups received 60 days of gait training over 6 months and the control groups received usual care (local physical therapist). At enrolment, our participants were autonomously motivated, physically active with high expectations. The interventions were well tolerated and resulted in a clear improvement in lower extremity muscle strength. However, no change was observed in quality of life, psychological outcomes or in walking function. Our findings are inconclusive due to low power. This training method may have benefits, but it is expensive and training effects are limited when baseline walking function is poor and training starts many years after the SCI. Earlier training start after SCI may be more promising.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe ATLET study received funding from the Norwegian Health Authorities. Gjensidige insurance company donated the gait-training robot. The Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation (EXTRA funds) (Now known as stiftelsen DAM) and the Regional health authority in Northern Norway provided funds to support the research and completion of my Phd.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/18147
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I: Piira, A., Lannem, A.M., Sørensen, M., Glott, T., Knutsen, R., Jørgensen, L., ... Knutsen, S.F. (2019). Manually assisted body-weight supported locomotor training does not re-establish walking in non-walking subjects with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. <i>Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 51</i>, 113-119. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/16352>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/16352. </a><p> <p>Paper II: Piira, A., Lannem, A.M., Sørensen, M., Glott, T., Knutsen, R., Jørgensen L., ... Knutsen, S.F. (2019). Robot-assisted locomotor training did not improve walking function in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. <i>Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 51</i>(5), 385-389. Also available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/16343>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/16343. </a> <p> <p>Paper III: Piira, A., Lannem, A.M., Gjesdal, K., Knutsen, R., Jørgensen, L., Glott, T. … Sørensen, M. (2019). Quality of life and psychological outcomes of body-weight supported locomotor training in spinal cord injured persons with long-standing incomplete lesions. <i>Spinal Cord, 118</i>. Also available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0401-2>https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0401-2. </a>en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)
dc.subject.courseIDDOKTOR-003
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800en_US
dc.titleThe ATLET study: Can subjects with long-standing motor incomplete spinal cord injury learn to walk? A randomized clinical trialen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.typeDoktorgradsavhandlingen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel