ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Det juridiske fakultet
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (jus)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Det juridiske fakultet
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (jus)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Governments' Enforcement of Corporate Bribery Laws: A Call for a Two-Track Regulatory Regime

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/18211
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-3096-2019-02-02
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (717.4Kb)
Akseptert manusversjon (PDF)
Dato
2019-06-13
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Rui, Jon Petter; Søreide, Tina
Sammendrag
Internationally, there is a trend toward a regulatory regime for corporate bribery with more emphasis on ex ante oversight and preventive systems, and less emphasis on investigations driven by suspected crime. Governments want the benefits associated with civil law regulation – including corporate self-regulation and the flexibility associated with non-trial resolutions, although such tools compromise values of criminal justice. In this article, we describe current legislative patterns and developments, and explain why governments need to learn from other areas of risk-based regulation, and establish a two-track regulatory regime consisting of a forward-looking administrative/civil law system with a focus on crime prevention and a backward-looking criminal law process for investigation of criminal incidents. A clearer institutional distinction between intrinsically different regulatory tasks will secure a more efficient regulation of corporate bribery and other forms of corporate misconduct.
Forlag
Universitetsforlaget
Sitering
Rui JPR, Søreide TS. Governments' Enforcement of Corporate Bribery Laws: A Call for a Two-Track Regulatory Regime. Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap. 2019;132(2):132-162
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (jus) [305]
© 2019 Universitetsforlaget AS

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring