Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPrejato, Marilisa Lo
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, David
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Cathrine
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-07T09:54:05Z
dc.date.available2020-12-07T09:54:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-31
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the relationship between remote sensing reflectance, R<sub>rs</sub>(λ) and the inherent optical properties (IOPs) of natural waters is potentially a key to improving our ability to determine biogeochemical constituents from radiometric measurements. These relationships are usually described as a function of absorption, <i>a</i>(λ), and backscattering, b<sub>b</sub>(λ), coefficients, with the literature providing various forms of equation operating on either <i>b</i><sub>b</sub>(λ)/<i>a</i>(λ) or <i>b</i><sub>b</sub>(λ)/[a(λ)+b<sub>b</sub>(λ)] to represent the impact of variations in light field geometries and changes in sea‐water composition. The performance of several IOP‐reflectance relationships is assessed using HydroLight radiative transfer simulations covering a broad range of Case 1 and Case 2 water conditions. While early versions of IOP‐reflectance relationships assigned variability to associated proportionality factors (e.g., f/Q) or low‐order polynomial functions, recent studies have demonstrated relationships between R<sub>rs</sub>(λ) and b<sub>b</sub>(λ)/[a(λ)+b<sub>b</sub>(λ)] are well‐characterized by nonlinear (high‐order polynomial), monotonic functions. This study demonstrates that this approach is also valid for relationships operating on b<sub>b</sub>(λ)/a(λ) and that there is no intrinsic benefit to functions operating on b<sub>b</sub>(λ)/[a(λ)+b<sub>b</sub>(λ)] compared to b<sub>b</sub>(λ)/a(λ) for Case 2 waters, contrary to recent suggestions in the literature. In all cases it is necessary to carefully consider the performance of best fit relationships across the full range of variability of IOPs and Rrs(λ), with higher order polynomials required to enable equivalent performance across the range of natural variability. The analysis further demonstrates insignificant wavelength sensitivity across the visible region, limited sensitivity to changes in solar zenith angle and extends to relationships for below surface remote sensing reflectance, rrs(λ).en_US
dc.identifier.citationPrejato, McKee D, Mitchell C. Inherent Optical Properties‐Reflectance Relationships Revisited. Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Oceans. 2020;125(11)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1852087
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2020JC016661
dc.identifier.issn2169-9275
dc.identifier.issn2169-9291
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/20001
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Oceans
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Mathematics and natural science: 400::Geosciences: 450en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400::Geofag: 450en_US
dc.titleInherent Optical Properties‐Reflectance Relationships Revisiteden_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel