Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorHovland, Anders
dc.contributor.advisorLappegård, Knut Tore
dc.contributor.authorHardersen, Randolf Inge
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T11:25:37Z
dc.date.available2021-01-21T11:25:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-12
dc.description.abstract<p><i>Introduction:</i> Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is used for the removal of LDL in selected patients and is also used for other medical indications. This thesis aimed to systematically study how different LDL apheresis systems affected the immune system in a biocompatibility perspective under in vivo and ex vivo conditions. <p><i>Methods:</i> Whole blood adsorption, dextran sulfate plasma adsorption, and double filtration plasma LDL apheresis systems were studied using a human whole blood model differentiating the effect of the lipoprotein apheresis and plasma separation columns, also describing temporal changes. <p><i>Results:</i> The in vivo study showed equal complement activation with all devices. Cytokines were consistently either increased, decreased, or unchanged. The ex vivo studies showed that the whole blood system was inert with regard to complement activation. The whole blood system reduced cytokine concentration and the plasma separation column can be a barrier to the reduction of eotaxin. Differences in temporal concentration changes were revealed for PDGF-BB and IP10. CD11b expression was complement factor 5 (C5) dependent and a possible C5 dependence for granulocyte-platelet conjugates formation was indicated. <p><i>Conclusion:</i> There are marked differences in how the three LDL apheresis systems affect the immune system. Low-density lipoprotein apheresis can modulate the immune system which possibly can be beneficial for the patient when used for medical indications other than LDL lowering. The results underline the importance of testing LDL apheresis systems independently for each medical indication they are used, other than the removal of lipoproteins, and to take temporal changes into account when developing treatment regimes.en_US
dc.description.doctoraltypeph.d.en_US
dc.description.popularabstractIn selected patients with elevated levels of cholesterol (low-density lipoprotein), blood is circulated through filters (apheresis) for the removal of cholesterol. This study investigated how three systems for cholesterol removal affect the immune system differently. Some of these systems separate the different parts of the blood (plasma separation) before the removal of cholesterol. In the contact between blood and the filter, the immune system is activated, and a biocompatibility reaction started. The filters also alter concentrations of other blood proteins. This can be beneficial and this treatment option can potentially be used for the treatment of other diseases. The main implications of the study are that thorough testing should be performed both in the laboratory and in patients before such systems are used in the treatment of diseases other than what they were designed for.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipForskningen er finansiert gjennom stilling relatert til undervisning av medisinske 5. års studenter lokalisert ved Nordlandssykehuset i Bodø medisinsk klinikk, utplassert fra UiT, iht prosjektbeskrivelsen.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/20354
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.relation.haspart<p>Paper I: Hovland, A., Hardersen, R., Sexton, J., Mollnes, T.E. & Lappegard, K.T. (2009). Different inflammatory responses induced by three LDL-lowering apheresis columns. <i>Journal of Clinical Apheresis, 24</i>(6), 247-253. Also available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.20223>https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.20223</a>. <p>Paper II: Hovland, A., Hardersen, R., Nielsen, E.W., Enebakk, T., Christiansen, D., Ludviksen, J.K. Mollnes, T.E. & Lappegard, K.T. (2012). Complement profile and activation mechanisms by different LDL apheresis systems. <i>Acta Biomaterialia, 8</i>(6), 2288-2296. Also available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.02.017>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.02.017</a>. <p>Paper III: Hardersen, R., Enebakk, T., Christiansen, D., Ludviksen J.K., Mollnes, T.E., Lappegard, K.T. & Hovland, A. (2020). Comparison of cytokine changes in three different lipoprotein apheresis systems in an ex vivo whole blood model. <i>Journal of Clinical Apheresis, 35</i>(2), 104-116. Also available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21765>https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.21765</a>. Accepted manuscript version available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17432>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/17432</a>. <p>Paper IV: Hardersen, R., Enebakk, T., Christiansen, D., Bergseth, G., Brekke, O.L., Mollnes, T.E. Lappegard, K.T. & Hovland, A. (2018). Granulocyte and monocyte CD11b expression during plasma separation is dependent on complement factor 5 (C5) - an ex vivo study with blood from a C5-deficient individual. <i>Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica (APMIS), 126</i>(4), 342-352. Also available at <a href=https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12821>https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12821</a>. Accepted manuscript version available in Munin at <a href=https://hdl.handle.net/10037/14970>https://hdl.handle.net/10037/14970</a>.en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2021 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en_US
dc.subject710:Medisinsk immunologien_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Basic medical, dental and veterinary science disciplines: 710::Medical immunology: 716en_US
dc.subjectBiocompatibilityen_US
dc.subjectPlasma separationen_US
dc.subjectLow-density lipoprotein apheresisen_US
dc.titleBiocompatibility in low-density lipoprotein apheresis and plasma separationen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.typeDoktorgradsavhandlingen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)