dc.contributor.author | Angell, Kim | |
dc.contributor.author | Huseby, Robert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-22T12:35:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-22T12:35:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-08-18 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article we defend the view that, on the All Affected Principle of voting rights, the weight of a person’s vote on a decision should be determined by and only by the degree to which that decision affects her interests, independently of her voting weights on other decisions. Further, we consider two recent alternative proposals for how the All Affected Principle should weight votes, and give reasons for rejecting both. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Angell K, Huseby R. The All Affected Principle, and the Weighting of Votes. Politics, Philosophy and Economics. 2020 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 1856322 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X20949938 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-594X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1741-3060 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/20387 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Politics, Philosophy and Economics | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2020 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Humanities: 000::Philosophical disciplines: 160 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Humaniora: 000::Filosofiske fag: 160 | en_US |
dc.title | The All Affected Principle, and the Weighting of Votes | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |