Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Mala
dc.contributor.authorDinant, Geert-Jan
dc.contributor.authorKentiba, Efrem
dc.contributor.authorTeshome, Teklu
dc.contributor.authorTeshome, Abinet
dc.contributor.authorTsegaye, Behailu
dc.contributor.authorSpigt, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-11T08:43:17Z
dc.date.available2021-03-11T08:43:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-03
dc.description.abstract<i>Objectives</i> - To evaluate the performance of the predictors in estimating the probability of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) when all versus only significant variables are combined into a decision model (1) among all clinical suspects and (2) among smear-negative cases based on the results of culture tests.<p> <p><i>Design</i> - A cross-sectional study.<p> <p><i>Setting</i> - Two public referral hospitals in Tigray, Ethiopia.<p> <p><i>Participants</i> - A total of 426 consecutive adult patients admitted to the hospitals with clinical suspicion of PTB were screened by sputum smear microscopy and chest radiograph (chest X-ray (CXR)) in accordance with the Ethiopian guidelines of the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program. Discontinuation of antituberculosis therapy in the past 3 months, unproductive cough, HIV positivity and unwillingness to give written informed consent were the basis of exclusion from the study.<p> <p><i>Primary and secondary outcome measures</i> - A total of 354 patients were included in the final analysis, while 72 patients were excluded because culture tests were not done.<p> <p><i>Results</i> - The strongest predictive variables of culture-positive PTB among patients with clinical suspicion were a positive smear test (OR 172; 95% CI 23.23 to 1273.54) and having CXR lesions compatible with PTB (OR 10.401; 95% CI 5.862 to 18.454). The regression model had a good predictive performance for identifying culture-positive PTB among patients with clinical suspicion (area under the curve (AUC) 0.84), but it was rather poor in patients with a negative smear result (AUC 0.64). Combining all the predictors in the model compared with only the independent significant variables did not really improve its performance to identify culture-positive (AUC 0.84–0.87) and culture-negative (AUC 0.64–0.69) PTB.<p> <p><i>Conclusions</i> - Our finding suggests that predictive models based on clinical variables will not be useful to discriminate patients with culture-negative PTB from patients with culture-positive PTB among patients with smear-negative cases.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGeorge, Dinant, Kentiba, Teshome, Teshome, Tsegaye, Spigt. Evaluation of the performance of clinical predictors in estimating the probability of pulmonary tuberculosis among smear-negative cases in Northern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):1-9
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1892380
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037913
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/20666
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.journalBMJ Open
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the performance of clinical predictors in estimating the probability of pulmonary tuberculosis among smear-negative cases in Northern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel