Low BMI, but not high BMI, influences the timing of puberty in boys
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/21850Dato
2021-02-05Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Forfatter
Oehme, Ninnie Helen Bakken; Roelants, Mathieu; Bruserud, Ingvild Særvold; Madsen, Andre; Bjerknes, Robert; Rosendahl, Karen; Juliusson, Pétur BenediktSammendrag
Objectives - To explore the relationship between degree of sexual maturation and anthropometric measures in Norwegian boys.
Methods - The following endpoints were collected in a Norwegian cross-sectional study of 324 healthy boys aged 9–16: ultrasound-determined testicular volume (USTV), total serum testosterone, Tanner pubic hair stage, height, weight, waist circumference (WC), subscapular skinfolds (SSF), and body fat percentage (%BF). Testicular volume-for-age z-scores were used to classify “early,” “average,” or “late” maturing boys. Ordinal logistic regression analyses with a proportional odds model were applied to analyze the association between anthropometric variables and age-adjusted degree of pubertal development, with results expressed as age-adjusted odds ratios (AOR). Cumulative incidence curves for reaching pubertal milestones were stratified by BMI.
Results - Boys with a low BMI for age (BMIz < −1) were less likely to have reached a pubertal testicular volume (USTV ≥ 2.7 mL) or a pubertal serum level of testosterone (≥0.5 nmol/L) compared to normal weight boys (AOR 0.3, p = 0.038, AOR 0.3, p = 0.026, respectively), and entered puberty on average with a delay of approximately eight months. Boys with high BMI for age (BMIz > 1) exhibited a comparable timing as normal weight boys. The same was found for WC. Pubertal markers were not associated with SSF or %BF.
Conclusion - By examining the association between puberty and weight status classified as low, average, or high, we found that a low BMI or WC for age were associated with a less advanced pubertal development and delayed timing of puberty in boys. No significant association was observed for a high BMI or WC. Moreover, no significant effects of SSF or %BF were observed. A low weight status should also be considered when assessing pubertal development in boys.