ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for biovitenskap, fiskeri og økonomi
  • Institutt for arktisk og marin biologi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (arktisk og marin biologi)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for biovitenskap, fiskeri og økonomi
  • Institutt for arktisk og marin biologi
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (arktisk og marin biologi)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/24566
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14259
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (601.8Kb)
Innsendt manusversjon (PDF)
Dato
2021-07-30
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
Article has an altmetric score of 11
Forfatter
de Oliveira, Marina Martins; Pereira, Carine Rodrigues; de Oliveira, Izabela R.C.; Godfroid, Jacques Xavier Leon; Lage, Andrey Pereira; Dorneles, Elaine Maria Seles
Sammendrag
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to recalculate the efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains and discuss the main variables associated with controlled trials to evaluate bovine brucellosis vaccine efficacy (VE). The most commonly used vaccine strain was S19, at a dose of 1010 colony forming units (CFU), followed by RB51 at 1010 CFU. The most commonly used challenge strain was B. abortus 2308, at a dose of 107 CFU, by the intraconjunctival route. Regarding the meta-analysis, trials were grouped according to the vaccine strain and dose to recalculate protection against abortion (four groups) or infection (five groups) using pooled risk ratio (RR) and VE. Regarding protection against abortion (n = 15 trials), the S19 vaccine at 109 CFU exhibited the highest protection rate (RR = 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.12–0.52; VE = 75.09%, 95% CI: 48.08–88.05), followed by RB51 at 1010 CFU (RR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16–0.61; VE = 69.25%, 95% CI: 39.48–84.38). Regarding protection against infection (n = 23 trials), only two subgroups exhibited significant protection: S19 at 109 CFU (RR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14–0.55; VE = 72.03%, 95% CI: 57.70– 81.50) and RB51 at 1010 CFU (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22–0.84; VE = 57.05%, 95% CI: 30.90–73.30). In conclusion, our results suggest that a dose of 109 CFU for S19 and 1010 CFU for RB51 are the most suitable for the prevention of abortion and infection caused by B. abortus.
Beskrivelse
This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: de Oliveira, M.M., Pereira, C.R., de Oliveira, I.R.C., Godfroid, J., Lage, A.P. & Dorneles, E.M.S. (2021). Efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14259. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Forlag
Wiley
Sitering
de Oliveira, M.M., Pereira, C.R., de Oliveira, I.R.C., Godfroid, J., Lage, A.P. & Dorneles, E.M.S. (2021). Efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases.
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (arktisk og marin biologi) [1630]
Copyright 2021 The Author(s)

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring

 
Picked up by 1 news outlets
Posted by 1 X users
56 readers on Mendeley
See more details