Vinorelbine and gemcitabine vs vinorelbine and carboplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. A phase III randomised controlled trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but earlier studies have suggested that non-platinum combinations are equally effective and better tolerated. We conducted a national, randomised study to compare a non-platinum with a platinum combination.<p> <p>METHODS: Eligible patients had stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and performance status (PS) 0-2. Patients received up to three cycles of vinorelbine 60 mg m ^-2 p.o. þ gemcitabine 1000 mg m ^-2 i.v. day 1 and 8 (VG) or vinorelbine 60 mg m^-2 p.o. day 1 and 8 þ carboplatin area under the curve ¼ 5 (Calvert’s formula) i.v. day 1 (VC). Patients X75 years received 75% of the dose. Endpoints were overall survival, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), toxicity, and the use of radiotherapy. <p>RESULTS: We randomised 444 patients from September 2007 to April 2009. The median age was 65 years, 58% were men and 25% had PS 2. Median survival was VG: 6.3 months; VC: 7.0 months, P ¼ 0.802. Vinorelbine plus carboplatin patients had more grade III/IV nausea/vomiting (VG: 4%, VC: 12%, P ¼ 0.008) and grade IV neutropenia (VG: 7%, VC: 19%, Po0.001). Infections, HRQoL and the use of radiotherapy did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. <p>CONCLUSION: The two regimens yielded similar overall survival. The VG combination had only a slightly better toxicity profile.