Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBrekke, Malene
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Rigmor
dc.contributor.authorAmro, Amin Abdul-Galeel
dc.contributor.authorGlavin, Kari
dc.contributor.authorHaugland, Trude
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-25T11:51:19Z
dc.date.available2022-08-25T11:51:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-09
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To identify instruments used to measure parents’ Quality of Life (QoL) during pregnancy and the postpartum period, and to describe their characteristics and psychometric properties.<p> <p>Methods: For this scoping review we conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and HaPI in mid-December 2020, to identify studies evaluating psychometric properties. The COnsensusbased Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) were used to defne and categorize psychometric properties. Two reviewers screened the studies independently, and customized screening questions were used to assess eligibility against inclusion criteria. Data were systematically extracted into a predesigned data charting matrix, and descriptively analyzed. <p>Results: The searches identifed 5671 studies, of which 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, there were 19 QoL instruments: 12 generic and seven period specifc. The most reported instruments were SF-36, SF-12 and WHOQOL-BREF, and the most evaluated instruments were SF-12, WHOQOL-BREF, QOL-GRAV, and PQOL. We found that none of the identifed instruments had been evaluated for all nine psychometric properties recommended by the COSMIN. The most reported psychometric properties were internal consistency and structural validity. The instruments were primarily assessed in parents residing in Asia (50%), and 83% of the studies were conducted from 2010 to 2020. Only three studies included psychometric measures assessed on fathers. <p>Conclusion: Our review shows there is extensive evidence on the internal consistency and structural validity of QoL instruments used on parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period, but that the evidence on other psychometric properties is sparse. Validation studies and primary studies are needed to provide evidence on the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of QoL instruments for this target group, in particular for fathers and partners.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBrekke, M., Berg, R.C., Amro, A. et al. Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 20, 107 (2022)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2038289
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12955-022-02011-y
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/26421
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.relation.journalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.subjectEtter fødsel / Postnatalen_US
dc.subjectGraviditet / Pregnancyen_US
dc.subjectLivskvalitet / Quality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectPsykometri / Psychometricsen_US
dc.subjectScoping review / Scoping reviewen_US
dc.titleQuality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping reviewen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel