dc.contributor.author | Brekke, Malene | |
dc.contributor.author | Berg, Rigmor | |
dc.contributor.author | Amro, Amin Abdul-Galeel | |
dc.contributor.author | Glavin, Kari | |
dc.contributor.author | Haugland, Trude | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-25T11:51:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-25T11:51:19Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-09 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To identify instruments used to measure parents’ Quality of Life (QoL) during pregnancy and the postpartum period, and to describe their characteristics and psychometric properties.<p>
<p>Methods: For this scoping review we conducted systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO,
CINAHL and HaPI in mid-December 2020, to identify studies evaluating psychometric properties. The COnsensusbased Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) were used to defne and categorize
psychometric properties. Two reviewers screened the studies independently, and customized screening questions
were used to assess eligibility against inclusion criteria. Data were systematically extracted into a predesigned data
charting matrix, and descriptively analyzed.
<p>Results: The searches identifed 5671 studies, of which 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, there were
19 QoL instruments: 12 generic and seven period specifc. The most reported instruments were SF-36, SF-12 and
WHOQOL-BREF, and the most evaluated instruments were SF-12, WHOQOL-BREF, QOL-GRAV, and PQOL. We found that
none of the identifed instruments had been evaluated for all nine psychometric properties recommended by the
COSMIN. The most reported psychometric properties were internal consistency and structural validity. The instruments were primarily assessed in parents residing in Asia (50%), and 83% of the studies were conducted from 2010 to
2020. Only three studies included psychometric measures assessed on fathers.
<p>Conclusion: Our review shows there is extensive evidence on the internal consistency and structural validity of QoL
instruments used on parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period, but that the evidence on other psychometric properties is sparse. Validation studies and primary studies are needed to provide evidence on the reliability,
validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of QoL instruments for this target group, in particular for fathers and
partners. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Brekke, M., Berg, R.C., Amro, A. et al. Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 20, 107 (2022) | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2038289 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12955-022-02011-y | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1477-7525 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26421 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BMC | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.subject | Etter fødsel / Postnatal | en_US |
dc.subject | Graviditet / Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject | Livskvalitet / Quality of Life | en_US |
dc.subject | Psykometri / Psychometrics | en_US |
dc.subject | Scoping review / Scoping review | en_US |
dc.title | Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |