ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraaknorsk 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administrasjon/UB
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for geovitenskap
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (geovitenskap)
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Fakultet for naturvitenskap og teknologi
  • Institutt for geovitenskap
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (geovitenskap)
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A standard protocol for describing the evaluation of ecological models

Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/26799
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110059
Thumbnail
Åpne
article.pdf (378.8Kb)
Akseptert manusversjon (PDF)
Dato
2022-07-21
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Forfatter
Planque, Benjamin; Aarflot, Johanna Myrseth; Buttay, Lucie; Carroll, JoLynn; Fransner, Sara Filippa Krusmynta; Hansen, Cecilie; Husson, Berengere; Langangen, Øystein Ole Gahr; Lindstrøm, Ulf Ove; Pedersen, Torstein; Primicerio, Raul; Sivel, Elliot Manuarii; Skogen, Morten D.; Strombom, Evelyn; Stige, Leif Christian; Varpe, Øystein; Yoccoz, Nigel
Sammendrag
Numerical models of ecological systems are increasingly used to address complex environmental and resource management questions. One challenge for scientists, managers, and stakeholders is to appraise how well suited these models are to answer questions of scientific or societal relevance, that is, to perform, communicate, or access transparent evaluations of ecological models. While there have been substantial developments to support standardised descriptions of ecological models, less has been done to standardise and to report model evaluation practices. We present here a general protocol designed to guide the reporting of model evaluation. The protocol is organised in three major parts: the objective(s) of the modelling application, the ecological patterns of relevance and the evaluation methodology proper, and is termed the OPE (objectives, patterns, evaluation) protocol. We present the 25 questions of the OPE protocol which address the many aspects of the evaluation process and then apply them to six case studies based on a diversity of ecological models. In addition to standardising and increasing the transparency of the model evaluation process, we find that going through the OPE protocol helps modellers to think more deeply about the evaluation of their models. From this last point, we suggest that it would be highly beneficial for modellers to consider the OPE early in the modelling process, in addition to using it as a reporting tool and as a reviewing tool.
Forlag
Elsevier
Sitering
Planque, Aarflot, Buttay, Carroll, Fransner, Hansen, Husson, Langangen, Lindstrøm, Pedersen, Primicerio, Sivel, Skogen, Strombom, Stige, Varpe, Yoccoz. A standard protocol for describing the evaluation of ecological models. Ecological Modelling. 2022;471
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (geovitenskap) [808]
Copyright 2022 The Author(s)

Bla

Bla i hele MuninEnheter og samlingerForfatterlisteTittelDatoBla i denne samlingenForfatterlisteTittelDato
Logg inn

Statistikk

Antall visninger
UiT

Munin bygger på DSpace

UiT Norges Arktiske Universitet
Universitetsbiblioteket
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Tilgjengelighetserklæring