Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKvarstein, Gunnvald
dc.contributor.advisorBech Risør, Mette
dc.contributor.authorRibe, Jørgen Jensen
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-09T12:07:24Z
dc.date.available2022-12-09T12:07:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-14
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Norwegian military contribution to Afghanistan has resulted in thousands of soldiers being deployed. Several studies have been conducted to investigate the factors that contribute to the development of mental health problems. Isolating and describing why, and in which setting these potential stressors produce adverse health effects are challenging. It may be dependent on how the individual subjectively perceives the situation. More knowledge about this process might be of use in identifying which events are more likely to have adverse effects on mental health. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the mind frame and coping mechanisms used by Norwegian Afghanistan veterans. Looking at how the soldiers regarded deployment to a warzone and experienced combat. Analysis of the data attempted to describe how they responded to combat situations. Method: Qualitative interviews using thematic analysis were applied to interpret the data. Five semi-structured interviews were conducted. The participants are former soldiers with an average at 8,8 years of service. Each participant had either three or four deployments to Afghanistan. Results: Analysis identified four main themes. Theme 1 (Subjective perception on deployment) explores how the participants view being deployed. Theme 2 (The first firefight) and theme 3 (The death of a colleague) explore how the soldiers perceive and react in the situations implied by the theme. Theme 4 (No plan survives the confrontation with reality) looks at severe situations where things can go wrong. Conclusion: The participants in the study had a positive mind frame towards deployment to Afghanistan. Combat situations were framed as both positive and negative. The findings suggest that the ability to personally and effectively intervene is regarded as an important criterion for how the participants view success, regardless of personal risk or outcome of a combat situation. This study further suggests that coping strategies in the military unit can be a cooperative project. It is indicated that non-danger-based events may be perceived as more traumatic than danger-based events while they are unfolding.en_US
dc.descriptionKlarer ikke gjennomføre sak: Failed to perform step 1 in Navigate Stage 'Activate Adobe Reader + Click Center' on page 'Read PDF' - Unable to match any windows with the query termsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/27763
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten_US
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2020 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)en_US
dc.subject.courseIDMED-3950
dc.subjectVDP::Social science: 200::Psychology: 260::Other psychology disciplines: 279en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Andre psykologiske fag: 279en_US
dc.titleBeing at war: Norwegian Afghanistan veterans’ experiences of military service and their coping strategies related to deployment, combat and stressful situations.en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.typeMastergradsoppgaveen_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)