Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDobler, Florian
dc.contributor.authorBachl, Philipp
dc.contributor.authorStöggl, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Erik P
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T11:47:59Z
dc.date.available2023-03-06T11:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-22
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare performance and physiological responses between a standard-paced 3-minute time trial (TT<sub>SP</sub>, ie, pacing based on normal intention) and a consistently all-out-paced 3-minute time trial (TTAOP). <p> <p>Methods: Sixteen well-trained male cyclists completed the TT<sub>SP</sub> and TT<sub>AOP</sub>, on separate days of testing, on a cycling ergometer with power output and respiratory variables measured. Time trials were preceded by 7 × 4-minute submaximal stages of increasing intensity with the linear relationship between power output and metabolic rate used to estimate the contribution from aerobic and anaerobic energy resources. The time course of anaerobic and aerobic contributions to power output was analyzed using statistical parametric mapping. <p> <p>Results: Mean power output was not different between the 2 pacing strategies (TT<sub>SP</sub> = 417 [43] W, TT<sub>AOP</sub> = 423 [41] W; P = 0.158). TT<sub>AOP</sub> resulted in higher peak power output (P < .001), mean ventilation rate (P < .001), mean heart rate (P = .044), peak accumulated anaerobically attributable work (P = .026), post-time-trial blood lactate concentration (P = .035), and rating of perceived exertion (P = .036). Statistical parametric mapping revealed a higher anaerobic contribution to power output during the first ∼30 seconds and a lower contribution between ∼90 and 170 seconds for TT<sub>AOP</sub> than TT<sub>SP</sub>. The aerobic contribution to power output was higher between ∼55 and 75 seconds for TT<sub>AOP</sub>. <p> <p>Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in performance (ie, mean power output) between the 2 pacing strategies, differences were found in the distribution of anaerobically and aerobically attributable power output. This implies that athletes can pace a 3-minute maximal effort very differently but achieve the same result.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDobler, Bachl P, Stöggl T, Andersson E. Physiological responses and performance during a 3-minute cycle time trial: standard paced versus all-out paced. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP). 2022en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2076644
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2022-0105
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.issn1555-0273
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/28679
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsen_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP)
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titlePhysiological responses and performance during a 3-minute cycle time trial: standard paced versus all-out paceden_US
dc.type.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)