Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRodina, Yulia
dc.contributor.authorBayram, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorDe Cat, Cecile Marie-Rose
dc.contributor.authorTomić, Aleksandra
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T10:31:28Z
dc.date.available2023-08-24T10:31:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-23
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: There exists a great degree of variability in the documentation of multilingual experience across different instruments. The present paper contributes to the “methods turn” and individual differences focus in (heritage) bilingualism by proposing a comprehensive online questionnaire building on existing questionnaires and the experience of using them to document heritage bilingualism: the Heritage Language Experience (HeLEx) online questionnaire. HeLEx is validated against and contrasted to an extended version of the Language and Social Background Questionnaire designed for heritage speakers (HSs), LSBQ-H.<p> <p>Methods: We compare data elicited with both questionnaires in turn from a group of Turkish HSs (n = 174, mean age=32). Our validation focuses on traditional language background variables, including language exposure and use, language proficiency, language dominance, as well as a more novel measure of language entropy. The analyses are based on a subset of key questions from each questionnaire that capture language experience for up to five languages, four modalities, and five social contexts. In a subsequent set of analyses, we explore the impact of different types of response scales, response mechanisms, and manners of variable derivation on the informativity of the data they can provide, in terms of the scope, granularity and distributional properties of the derived measures. <p>Results and Discussion: Our results show that both HeLEx and LSBQ-H are successful at detecting the important distributional patterns in the data and reveal a number of advantages of HeLEx. In the discussion, we consider the impact of methodological choices regarding question phrasing, visual format, response options, and response mechanisms. We emphasize that these choices are not trivial and can affect the derived measures and subsequent analyses on the impact of individual differences on language acquisition and processing.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRodina, Bayram, De Cat. Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2148860
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131374
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/30317
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Psychology
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/799652/EU/Blingual Literacy and Input Knowledge Outcomes: Tracing Heritage Language Bilingual Development/BLINK/en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleDocumenting heritage language experience using questionnairesen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)