dc.contributor.author | Rodina, Yulia | |
dc.contributor.author | Bayram, Fatih | |
dc.contributor.author | De Cat, Cecile Marie-Rose | |
dc.contributor.author | Tomić, Aleksandra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-24T10:31:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-24T10:31:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-05-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: There exists a great degree of variability in the documentation
of multilingual experience across different instruments. The present paper
contributes to the “methods turn” and individual differences focus in (heritage)
bilingualism by proposing a comprehensive online questionnaire building on
existing questionnaires and the experience of using them to document heritage
bilingualism: the Heritage Language Experience (HeLEx) online questionnaire.
HeLEx is validated against and contrasted to an extended version of the Language
and Social Background Questionnaire designed for heritage speakers (HSs),
LSBQ-H.<p>
<p>Methods: We compare data elicited with both questionnaires in turn from a
group of Turkish HSs (n = 174, mean age=32). Our validation focuses on traditional
language background variables, including language exposure and use, language
proficiency, language dominance, as well as a more novel measure of language
entropy. The analyses are based on a subset of key questions from each
questionnaire that capture language experience for up to five languages, four
modalities, and five social contexts. In a subsequent set of analyses, we explore the
impact of different types of response scales, response mechanisms, and manners
of variable derivation on the informativity of the data they can provide, in terms
of the scope, granularity and distributional properties of the derived measures.
<p>Results and Discussion: Our results show that both HeLEx and LSBQ-H are
successful at detecting the important distributional patterns in the data and reveal
a number of advantages of HeLEx. In the discussion, we consider the impact of
methodological choices regarding question phrasing, visual format, response
options, and response mechanisms. We emphasize that these choices are not
trivial and can affect the derived measures and subsequent analyses on the impact
of individual differences on language acquisition and processing. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rodina, Bayram, De Cat. Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2148860 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131374 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/30317 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Frontiers in Psychology | |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/799652/EU/Blingual Literacy and Input Knowledge Outcomes: Tracing Heritage Language Bilingual Development/BLINK/ | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2023 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | en_US |
dc.title | Documenting heritage language experience using questionnaires | en_US |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Tidsskriftartikkel | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |