Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDanielsen, Elisabet
dc.contributor.authorGulati, Sasha
dc.contributor.authorSalvesen, Øyvind Olav
dc.contributor.authorIngebrigtsen, Tor
dc.contributor.authorNygaard, Øystein Petter
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Tore
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T11:56:14Z
dc.date.available2023-08-29T11:56:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractAims - The number of patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy has increased. In many countries, public hospitals have limited capacity. This has resulted in long waiting times for elective treatment and a need for supplementary private healthcare. It is uncertain whether the management of patients and the outcome of treatment are equivalent in public and private hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the management and patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway, and to assess whether the effectiveness of the treatment was equivalent.<p> <p>Methods - This was a comparative study using prospectively collected data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. A total of 4,750 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy and were followed for 12 months were included. Case-mix adjustment between those managed in public and private hospitals was performed using propensity score matching. The primary outcome measure was the change in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) between baseline and 12 months postoperatively. A mean difference in improvement of the NDI score between public and private hospitals of ≤ 15 points was considered equivalent. Secondary outcome measures were a numerical rating scale for neck and arm pain and the EuroQol five-dimension three-level health questionnaire. The duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications were also recorded.<p> <p>Results - The mean improvement from baseline to 12 months postoperatively of patients who underwent surgery in public and private hospitals was equivalent, both in the unmatched cohort (mean NDI difference between groups 3.9 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 5.6); p < 0.001) and in the matched cohort (4.0 points (95% CI 2.3 to 5.7); p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed similar results. The duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in public hospitals. Those treated in private hospitals reported significantly fewer complications in the unmatched cohort, but not in the matched cohort.<p> <p>Conclusion - The clinical effectiveness of surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals was equivalent 12 months after surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDanielsen, Gulati, Salvesen, Ingebrigtsen, Nygaard, Solberg. Clinical outcomes after surgery for cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals : a nationwide relative effectiveness study. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2023;105-B(1):64-71
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2135371
dc.identifier.doi10.1302/0301-620X.105B1.BJJ-2022-0591.R1
dc.identifier.issn2049-4394
dc.identifier.issn2049-4408
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/30513
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBritish Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.journalThe Bone & Joint Journal
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleClinical outcomes after surgery for cervical radiculopathy performed in public and private hospitals : a nationwide relative effectiveness studyen_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)