Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAngell, Kim
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-31T08:09:05Z
dc.date.available2023-08-31T08:09:05Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-19
dc.description.abstractAlthough many accept the Rawlsian distinction between ‘end-state’ and ‘transitional’ principles, theorists disagree strongly over which feasibility constraint to use when selecting the former. While ‘minimalists’ favor a scientific-laws-only constraint, ‘non-minimalists’ believe that end-state principles should also be constrained by what people could (empirically) accept after reasoned discussion. I argue that a theorist who follows ‘non-minimalism’ will devise end-state principles that cannot be realized (as end-state principles), or cannot be stabilized (as end-state principles), or are indistinguishable in content from those she would have selected had she followed ‘minimalism.’ The paper ends by outlining the implications of my analysis for the broader methodological map of political philosophy.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAngell K. Should Rawlsian end-state principles be constrained by popular beliefs about justice?. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP). 2023en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2171090
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2023.2247313
dc.identifier.issn1369-8230
dc.identifier.issn1743-8772
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/30569
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.journalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP)
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleShould Rawlsian end-state principles be constrained by popular beliefs about justice?en_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)