ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Guilt and Grievability at War: Military Accountability and the Other in 'Mark of Cain' and 'Battle for Haditha'

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/32057
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (289.4Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Date
2024
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Pötzsch, Holger
Abstract
This article conducts a critical reading of the British war films Mark of Cain (Munden, 2007) and Battle for Haditha (Broomfield, 2007). Establishing the significance of cultural representations for politics and collective memory, I first locate both films in their historical and cultural contexts before I offer analyses that focus on the representation of US and British soldiers, Iraqi insurgents, and Iraqi civilians. I argue that Mark of Cain dissects how misunderstood loyalty, peer-pressure, and military organization facilitated abuses by British soldiers against Iraqi prisoners, but at the same time narrowly frames the Iraqi other as either largely invisible threat or hyper-visible helpless victim. In contrast, Battle for Haditha draws a more sophisticated picture of the Iraq war focusing on structural aspects of the conflict. In presenting the Iraq theater of war as a complex political economy with shifting allegiances and blurring loyalties, Broomfield offers insights in the backgrounds and rationalities of US soldiers, Iraqi civilians, and insurgents and this way alerts the viewer to structural aspects of evil in war as a system that reduces the paradigm of possible actions on all sides until only wrong decisions can be made. This, I conclude, makes Battle for Haditha an anti-war film proper.
Citation
Pötzsch H. Guilt and Grievability at War: Military Accountability and the Other in 'Mark of Cain' and 'Battle for Haditha' . Journal of War and Culture Studies. 2024;17
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur) [1476]
Copyright 2024 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)