ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for humaniora, samfunnsvitenskap og lærerutdanning
  • Institutt for språk og kultur
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Does a name make a difference? The neo-documentalist movement, where does it stand after 27 years 1996–2023

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/33308
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2023-0070
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (327.2Kb)
Accepted manuscript version (PDF)
Date
2023-09-01
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Lund, Niels Windfeld
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to analyze how the Neo-documentalist movement, initiated in 1996 by Michael Buckland, Boyd Rayward and Niels Lund, has evolved in its 27 years history, how the choice of documentation as name of the new program in Tromsø has made a difference in the LIS field and how different documentation scholars around the world has participated and approached the movement until now.

Design/methodology/approach - The paper has approached the “Neo-documentalist movement” in a historical perspective from 1996 to 2023 discussing what difference does the choice of a concept make, when the concept of documentation is chosen instead of information in the name of a program and for the general discussion of the object of an academic field like Library and Information Science.

Findings - The analysis shows that it did make a difference to choose the concept of documentation as name of the program in Tromsø and the Neo-documentalist movement contributed to a new focus and discussion of the informative objects, the documents and their creation, not only in Tromsø, but in different parts of the world across linguistic borders.

Originality/value - The paper is original by the fact that it is the first time that the neo documentalist movement has been reviewed on a global scale across linguistic barriers. It has value by a discussion of the ways in which a choice of concept matter in relation to defining a field and the research agenda.

Publisher
Emerald
Citation
Lund. Does a name make a difference? The neo-documentalist movement, where does it stand after 27 years 1996–2023. Journal of Documentation. 2023:1-9
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (språk og kultur) [1473]
Copyright 2023 The Author(s)

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)