Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFeleke, Tekabe Legesse
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T07:25:25Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T07:25:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-21
dc.description.abstractFor decades, linguists have been working to formulate an objective means of distinguishing dialects from languages, but dialect recognition has largely remained a subjective enterprise. Only recently have some studies proposed a processing-based psycholinguistic approach toward dialect recognition. These studies argued that dialect words are stored as a co-dependent representation, not as an independent representation of the words of bilingual speakers. Based on these studies, we investigated the lexical selection and processing mechanisms of bilingual and bidialectal speakers of two understudied languages, Oromo and Amharic, using the picture–word interference paradigm. We found independent lexical representations for both the bilingual and the bidialectal groups, which implies the involvement of the same cognitive mechanisms in both language and dialect processing. Thus, we argue that bidialectal speakers have flexible lexical representation and selection mechanisms that are dependent on the speakers’ previous language experience. Here, we propose a dynamic lexical selection model that accommodates diverse dialect ecologies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFeleke. Dialect Recognition via Lexical Processing: Is It a Viable Litmus Test?. Languages. 2024;9(6)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 2284684
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/languages9060186
dc.identifier.issn2226-471X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/35234
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.journalLanguages
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)en_US
dc.titleDialect Recognition via Lexical Processing: Is It a Viable Litmus Test?en_US
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Med mindre det står noe annet, er denne innførselens lisens beskrevet som Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)