dc.contributor.author | Sokolova, Svetlana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T13:11:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-29T13:11:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10-27 | |
dc.description.abstract | This chapter brings together the issues of analogy and contrast through a perspective of linguistic borrowing. We analyze the integration of new [N[N]] compounds, borrowed from English into Russian (e.g. top-igrok ‘top player’). By discussing two corpus studies and two small experiments, we show that Russian new [N[N]] compounds reflect both “levelling” and “extension”. There are at least three factors that can block “leveling”: statistical preemption, which is overridden by pragmatic factors; multiplicity of competing alternatives, when several suffixes could be added to the stem to form a relational adjective; and semantics that leads to a split between the two forms. Compound modifiers seem to represent terms and official titles, whereas adjective phrases become qualitative, where possible, or pragmatic. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Sokolova S: Analogy and contrast at the morphology-syntax interface: A case study of new Russian [N[N]] compounds. In: Krawczak, Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk B, Grygiel M. Analogy and Contrast in Language. Perspectives from Cognitive Linguistics, 2022. John Benjamins Publishing Company p. 303-340 | en_US |
dc.identifier.cristinID | FRIDAID 2048625 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.73.10sok | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789027211545 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10037/36971 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Benjamins Publishing | en_US |
dc.rights.accessRights | openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.title | Analogy and contrast at the morphology-syntax interface: A case study of new Russian [N[N]] compounds | en_US |
dc.type.version | acceptedVersion | en_US |
dc.type | Chapter | en_US |
dc.type | Bokkapittel | en_US |