Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSmith-Simonsen, Christine
dc.contributor.authorBachmann, Anne Marit
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-24T11:15:36Z
dc.date.available2014-10-24T11:15:36Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-10
dc.description.abstractMany current peace researchers claim that Peace Studies has fallen ill (some even say as an academic field it is dead). This thesis goes through the development of Peace Studies as a field. Further, it considers the different views on what it is and what it should be, in relation to other forms of internationally focused studies. From this it highlights some of the conflicting views and value-bases, and through the use of Bourdieu's theory of practice it tries to explain and structure the different conflicts and issues this causes for the people in this field as well as the future of the field. In the end it lands on a suggestion for a "cure" which it already contains, namely the principles of Peace Education.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/6764
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-uit_munin_6365
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherUiT Norges arktiske universiteten
dc.publisherUiT The Arctic University of Norwayen
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2014 The Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)en_US
dc.subject.courseIDSVF-3901en
dc.subjectPeace Education, Peace Studies, Bourdieuen
dc.subjectVDP::Social science: 200::Political science and organizational theory: 240en
dc.titleConflicted Peace: A Theoretical View of Peace Studies, Situated in Academia, Normativity and Political Correctnessen
dc.typeMaster thesisen
dc.typeMastergradsoppgaveen


File(s) in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)