The politics of Dissensus and Political Liberalism
ForfatterAlnes, Jan Harald
An emerging branch of political theory, ‘the politics of dissensus’, starts out from the premise that in order to understand the politics of constitutional democracies, one needs to focus on parliamentary politics, which compromises both institutional settings and debates. Politics takes place among adversaries, and dissensus and argumentation pro et contra is the rule. The focus on the conditions for consensus in contemporary democratic theory accordingly misses the essence of politics. The politics of dissensus tends to think that the political philosophy inaugurated by John Rawls, political liberalism in particular, is too idealistic and utopian to capture real parliamentary politics. I argue that this basic objection against political liberalism is misconceived. To the contrary, the politics of dissensus and political liberalism supplement each other. The impact of my argument is that research in these disparate fields of political studies ought to enlighten each of them.
Accepted manuscript version. Published version at http://doi.org/10.1177/0191453716658692.
SiteringAlnes JHA. The politics of Dissensus and Political Liberalism. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2016:1-18
MetadataVis full innførsel
Viser innførsler relatert til tittel, forfatter og emneord.
Nicolaysen, Leif Gunnar Nyseth (Master thesis; Mastergradsoppgave, 2008-06)Consociationalism and segmented cleavages. The case of Lebanon is about the political development of Lebanon. It is intended to be an exploration, as objective as possible, to the development of major cleavages of Lebanese ...
Fowkes, Mari Østrådt (Master thesis; Mastergradsoppgave, 2015-05-09)Studien betrakter utviklingen av forsvarssamarbeidet mellom Norge og Russland i perioden fra 2008 frem til 2014, samtidig som den søker å identifisere norske intensjoner ved forsvarssamarbeidet med Russland. Ved bruk av ...
Reiersen, Atle (Master thesis; Mastergradsoppgave, 2017-05-23).