Realist review: Current practice and future prospects
Realist review has emerged as a specific literature review approach that is concerned with explaining the outcomes of complex intervention programs. We undertook a systematic scoping review to examine the current practice of realist reviews. A systematic scoping review is a process of mapping the existing evidence base on a particular topic. We identified a growing body of literature using the realist review approach. We selected 54 reviews for our study. These reviews covered a range of topics, including health care, education, management, and public safety. We found that the initial process of e xploratory scoping of the literature was described in only 58 per cent of the reviews. The approaches regarding appraisal, analysis, and synthesis of the selected studies were poorly described in most reviews. Overall, there was little uniformity and trans parency regarding many methodological issues. Specific methodological guidance may need to be developed if realist reviews are to have a more uniform and transparent approach .
ForlagAthabasca University Press. Journal of Research Practice
SiteringBerg RC, Nanavati J. Realist review: Current practice and future prospects. Journal of Research Practice. 2016;12(1)
Viser innførsler relatert til tittel, forfatter og emneord.
Peer review at the University of Tromsø : a study of time spent on reviewing and researchers’ opinions on peer review Refsdal, Maria (Master thesis; Mastergradsoppgave, 2010-06)This thesis examines peer review at the University of Tromsø (UiT). It focuses on how much time is spent on reviewing at this particular institution, in addition to examine the researchers’ opinions on several aspects of peer review. It starts with a theoretical introduction to peer review, with a historical background, presentations of different models, problems and advantages in the review process, ...
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Somatic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Elbert, Niels J; van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke; van Renselaar, Wilco; Ekeland, Anne G.; Hakkaart-van Roijen, Leona; Raat, Hein; Nijsten, Tamar EC; Pasmans, Suzanne GMA (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2014)Background: eHealth potentially enhances quality of care and may reduce health care costs. However, a review of systematic reviews published in 2010 concluded that high-quality evidence on the benefits of eHealth interventions was still lacking. Objective: We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness/cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions in ...
Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews Andersen, Hege; Røvik, Kjell Arne; Ingebrigtsen, Tor (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2014)Objective: Lean interventions aim to improve quality of healthcare by reducing waste and facilitate flow in work processes. There is conflicting evidence on the outcomes of lean thinking, with quantitative and qualitative studies often contradicting each other. We suggest that reviewing the literature within the approach of a new contextual framework can deepen our understanding of lean as a ...