Realist review: Current practice and future prospects
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/10661Dato
2016-07-08Type
Journal articleTidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed
                
            
Sammendrag
Realist review has emerged as a specific literature review approach that is concerned with 
explaining  the  outcomes  of  complex  intervention  programs.  We  undertook  a  systematic  
scoping  review  to  examine  the  current  practice  of  realist  reviews.  A  systematic  scoping  
review  is  a  process  of  mapping  the  existing  evidence  base  on  a  particular  topic.  We  
identified  a  growing  body  of  literature  using  the  realist  review  approach.  We  selected  54  
reviews  for  our  study.  These  reviews  covered  a  range  of  topics,  including  health  care,  
education, management, and public safety. We found that the initial process of e
xploratory 
scoping of the literature was described in only 58 per cent of the reviews. The approaches 
regarding appraisal, analysis, and synthesis of the selected studies were poorly described in 
most  reviews.  Overall,  there  was  little  uniformity  and  trans
parency  regarding  many  
methodological  issues.  Specific  methodological  guidance  may  need  to  be  developed  if  
realist reviews are to have a more uniform and transparent approach
.
Beskrivelse
Forlag
Athabasca University Press. Journal of Research PracticeSitering
Berg RC, Nanavati J. Realist review: Current practice and future prospects. Journal of Research Practice. 2016;12(1)Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Relaterte innførsler
Viser innførsler relatert til tittel, forfatter og emneord.
- 
Peer review at the University of Tromsø : a study of time spent on reviewing and researchers’ opinions on peer review 
Refsdal, Maria (Master thesis; Mastergradsoppgave, 2010-06)This thesis examines peer review at the University of Tromsø (UiT). It focuses on how much time is spent on reviewing at this particular institution, in addition to examine the researchers’ opinions on several aspects of peer review. It starts with a theoretical introduction to peer review, with a historical background, presentations of different models, problems and advantages in the review process, ... - 
Why do researchers decline reviewer invitations? Response to the editorial ‘The Peer Review Process: Growing Problem in Recruiting Qualified Reviewers’ 
Hadler-Olsen, Elin Synnøve (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2025-02-03)In the editorial ‘The Peer Review Process: Growing Problem in Recruiting Qualified Reviewers’, Editor-in-Chief of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, Palle Holmstrup, addresses the increasing difficulty in recruiting qualified reviewers for the publishing process. He cites statistics indicating that over the past decade, editors at his journal have had to double the average number of reviewer invitations ... - 
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Somatic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 
Elbert, Niels J; van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke; van Renselaar, Wilco; Ekeland, Anne G.; Hakkaart-van Roijen, Leona; Raat, Hein; Nijsten, Tamar EC; Pasmans, Suzanne GMA (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2014)Background: eHealth potentially enhances quality of care and may reduce health care costs. However, a review of systematic reviews published in 2010 concluded that high-quality evidence on the benefits of eHealth interventions was still lacking. Objective: We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness/cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions in ... 


English
norsk


