ub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.muninLogoub.xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.openResearchArchiveLogo
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Velg spraakEnglish 
    • EnglishEnglish
    • norsknorsk
  • Administration/UB
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Det helsevitenskapelige fakultet
  • Institutt for samfunnsmedisin
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Realist review: Current practice and future prospects

Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/10037/10661
Thumbnail
View/Open
article.pdf (393.6Kb)
(PDF)
Date
2016-07-08
Type
Journal article
Tidsskriftartikkel
Peer reviewed

Author
Berg, Rigmor; Nanavati, Julie
Abstract
Realist review has emerged as a specific literature review approach that is concerned with explaining the outcomes of complex intervention programs. We undertook a systematic scoping review to examine the current practice of realist reviews. A systematic scoping review is a process of mapping the existing evidence base on a particular topic. We identified a growing body of literature using the realist review approach. We selected 54 reviews for our study. These reviews covered a range of topics, including health care, education, management, and public safety. We found that the initial process of e xploratory scoping of the literature was described in only 58 per cent of the reviews. The approaches regarding appraisal, analysis, and synthesis of the selected studies were poorly described in most reviews. Overall, there was little uniformity and trans parency regarding many methodological issues. Specific methodological guidance may need to be developed if realist reviews are to have a more uniform and transparent approach .
Description
Source:http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/538/449
Publisher
Athabasca University Press. Journal of Research Practice
Citation
Berg RC, Nanavati J. Realist review: Current practice and future prospects. Journal of Research Practice. 2016;12(1)
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler, rapporter og annet (samfunnsmedisin) [1514]

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Thumbnail

    Peer review at the University of Tromsø : a study of time spent on reviewing and researchers’ opinions on peer review 

    Refsdal, Maria (Master thesis; Mastergradsoppgave, 2010-06)
    This thesis examines peer review at the University of Tromsø (UiT). It focuses on how much time is spent on reviewing at this particular institution, in addition to examine the researchers’ opinions on several aspects of peer review. It starts with a theoretical introduction to peer review, with a historical background, presentations of different models, problems and advantages in the review process, ...
  • Thumbnail

    Why do researchers decline reviewer invitations? Response to the editorial ‘The Peer Review Process: Growing Problem in Recruiting Qualified Reviewers’ 

    Hadler-Olsen, Elin Synnøve (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2025-02-03)
    In the editorial ‘The Peer Review Process: Growing Problem in Recruiting Qualified Reviewers’, Editor-in-Chief of Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, Palle Holmstrup, addresses the increasing difficulty in recruiting qualified reviewers for the publishing process. He cites statistics indicating that over the past decade, editors at his journal have had to double the average number of reviewer invitations ...
  • Thumbnail

    Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Somatic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 

    Elbert, Niels J; van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke; van Renselaar, Wilco; Ekeland, Anne G.; Hakkaart-van Roijen, Leona; Raat, Hein; Nijsten, Tamar EC; Pasmans, Suzanne GMA (Journal article; Tidsskriftartikkel; Peer reviewed, 2014)
    Background: eHealth potentially enhances quality of care and may reduce health care costs. However, a review of systematic reviews published in 2010 concluded that high-quality evidence on the benefits of eHealth interventions was still lacking. Objective: We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness/cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions in ...

Browse

Browse all of MuninCommunities & CollectionsAuthor listTitlesBy Issue DateBrowse this CollectionAuthor listTitlesBy Issue Date
Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
UiT

Munin is powered by DSpace

UiT The Arctic University of Norway
The University Library
uit.no/ub - munin@ub.uit.no

Accessibility statement (Norwegian only)