Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Bent
dc.contributor.authorSistiaga, Manu Berrondo
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Juan
dc.contributor.authorSala, Antonello
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T15:56:28Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T15:56:28Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to provide practitioners working with trawl selectivity with general and easily understandable guidelines regarding the fish sampling effort necessary during sea trials. In particular, we focused on how many fish would need to be caught and length measured in a trawl haul in order to assess the selectivity parameters of the trawl at a designated uncertainty level. We also investigated the dependency of this uncertainty level on the experimental method used to collect data and on the potential effects of factors such as the size structure in the catch relative to the size selection of the gear. We based this study on simulated data created from two different fisheries: the Barents Sea cod (Gadus morhua) trawl fishery and the Mediterranean Sea multispecies trawl fishery represented by red mullet (Mullus barbatus). We used these two completely different fisheries to obtain results that can be used as general guidelines for other fisheries. We found that the uncertainty in the selection parameters decreased with increasing number of fish measured and that this relationship could be described by a power model. The sampling effort needed to achieve a specific uncertainty level for the selection parameters was always lower for the covered codend method compared to the paired-gear method. In many cases, the number of fish that would need to be measured to maintain a specific uncertainty level was around 10 times higher for the paired-gear method than for the covered codend method. The trends observed for the effect of sampling effort in the two fishery cases investigated were similar; therefore the guidelines presented herein should be applicable to other fisheries.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe following institutes funded this work: SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture (Norway)(www. sintef.no), National Research Council (CNR) – Institute of Marine Sciences (ISMAR) (Italy) (www. ismar.cnr.it) and the Thünen Institute for Baltic Sea Fisheries (Germany) (www.ti.bund.de).en_US
dc.descriptionPublished version. Source at <a href=http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161512>http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161512</a>. License <a href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>CC BY 4.0</a>.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHerrmann B, Sistiaga MB, Santos, Sala A. How many fish need to be measured to effectively evaluate trawl selectivity?. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8)en_US
dc.identifier.cristinIDFRIDAID 1401292
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0161512
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10037/10718
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONE
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccessen_US
dc.subjectFisheriesen_US
dc.subjectRationsen_US
dc.subjectCurve fittingen_US
dc.subjectCoden_US
dc.subjectCovarianceen_US
dc.subjectSimulation and modelingen_US
dc.subjectConfidence intervalsen_US
dc.subjectMediterranean Seaen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Agriculture and fishery disciplines: 900::Fisheries science: 920en_US
dc.titleHow many fish need to be measured to effectively evaluate trawl selectivity?en_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typeTidsskriftartikkelen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel